LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

case law on sec 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act

(Querist) 25 February 2011 This query is : Resolved 
I need a case law to demand serious and strict punishment for cheq dishonour. In one case, accused has been sentenced for 3 months for cheq dishonour of Rs 9 lacs out of which he later paid part leaving Rs 2.7 lacs still o/s. Court ordered Rs 5.4 lacs to be paid with 3 months sentence. Accused has gone into appeal. Appellate court's mind is known during arguments (to be concluded next week) being very lenient to accused and something like waiving sentence and compensation leaving only o/s amount to be paid. I want to argue that punishment u/s 138 must be serious and strict to have any impact of the law. Pls give me some good case laws to support this argument. Thanking you,
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (Expert) 25 February 2011
You may argue any thing but it must have support of facts of the case.
Amit Minocha (Expert) 25 February 2011
agree with expert
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Expert) 26 February 2011
prove every thing before the court,face the trail.
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Expert) 26 February 2011
prove every thing before the court,face the trail.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :