DV Case

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 04 July 2011 This query is : Resolved
Respected Arun Bhagat Sir,

Sir, You just replied only one query that is regarding lawyer.

But with words,( dare to Lodge FIR against her), collect evidence,

Respect for profession:
MYSELF IS ALSO A PROFESSIONAL IN MY FIELD,BUT PROFESSION TO PROFESSION THEIR IS ALWAYS SOME DIFFERENCE.

IN LAW PROFESSION, WHEN ONE LEARN DURING COURSE OF LAW , PROFESSIONAL ETHICS HAVING SEVERAL POINTS INCLUDING VALUES AND OBLIGATION TOWARDS SOCIETY.

DIGNITY OF THIS PROFESSION IS ABOVE COMMON PERSON AS SOCIAL OBLIGATION WHICH BINDS AND ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROFESSION IS MUCH HIGHER THAN A COMMON MAN.

MY CASE IS MERE A QUESTION TO HANDLE, BECAUSE MY WIFE IS WITH ME?

REGARDING ANTISOCIAL WORD AND EVIDENCE WITH ME.

1)A LAWYER WHO TOOK FEES OF MEDIATORSHIP, DID MEDIATORSHIP FOR FOUR MONTHS,MORE THAN 30 MEETINGS WERE HELD AMONG PARTIES.

2) SUFFICIENT NO OF MESSAGES ARE PRESENT OF COMMUNICATION.

3)LAWYER KNOWS WELL THERE IS NO DISPUTE PRESENT BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.

4)LAWYER MEDIATORSHIP IS CONFIRMING IN THE COURT FROM THE DOCUMENT SUBMITTED BY MY WIFE.

5) THE WAY MEDIATOR IS CONFIRMING IN THE COURT IS REVEALLING THAT ONE SIDE SHE TOOK ME IN CONFIDENCE SO THAT I REMAIN SILENT ON THE OTHERSIDE PREPARE TO MY WIFE FOR THE CASE. WHICH IS ENTIRELY COMPLETE OPPOSITE WORK OF MEDIATORSHIP.
FOOLING TO BOTH PARTIES FOR WHAT?

PROVERB: WHEN ONE THROW A STONE ON GLASS IT IS NOT ALWAYS COMPULSORY THAT GLASS WILL BROKE BUT WHAT MARK IT LEAVES ON IT WILL BE A REMEMBERING MARK.

THANKS FOR YOUR REPLY

BUT SIR,I DONT WANT TO SPOIL THE CAREER OR LIVES WHICH ARE ASSOCIATE WITH THE LAWYER ,BUT JUST WANT TO REVEAL THE LAWYER WHAT THE LAWYER HAD DONE IS WRONG.

AND KINDLY REPLY MY REMAINING QUERIES

DONT MIND, ALL FINGERS IN A HAND ARE NOT ALIKE, AND PLZ DONT GET ANGRY,

Follow Query

Report Abuse