Prashant bhushan's beating
aditya
(Querist) 14 October 2011
This query is : Resolved
To all the Respected Advocates, we recently witnessed the disgraceful act of senior advocate Prashant Bhishan's beating, so which section of IPC does this act attracts? Can we say it was voluntary causing hurt under section u/s 323 of IPC?
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 14 October 2011
Yes, also trespassing and many other sections.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
aditya
(Querist) 14 October 2011
How can it be trespassing? It's not solely for private motives,the belongs to supreme court and "Trespassers will be prosecuted" sign doesn't suit here, i think so, could be wrong
Sankaranarayanan
(Expert) 14 October 2011
yes it can be by many other section too , i agreed with mr shonee
Nadeem Qureshi
(Expert) 14 October 2011
Dear aditya
the chember of a Lawyer is not Public Property, without permission entery in this place is trespass, 323 Ipc,.350, 351,355, 441 of IPC all the section can be
Arvind Singh Chauhan
(Expert) 14 October 2011
They requires a lesson also, there should be country label protest. Really shame on judiciary and on lawyers also. which can't protect it's parts. Police seems to be lame there. Strict action is must against liable police officials. Only booking culprits in particular offense is no remedy they are feeling proud on their action.
Whatever was Mr Bhusan's fault, required to be condemned,and legal action. It is an example of our crippled administration and legal system.
There must be amendment in Cr.P.C that while lawyer is working in his chamber and is within court campus. he must be deemed as public servant.
Whether only salaried person doing public function is public servant? Private lawyer doing his work in his camber within court premises is not doing pubic work ? only because he is being paid by his client and not by govt ?
