Clarification of 0rder

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 07 August 2021 This query is : Resolved
suit for redemption transfer of property act
60 filed dismiss in various court admitted in supreme court in which order 39 1 and 2 application
was there and cost of 1 lac imposed on me order of( supreme court is here implementation of impugned judgement shall remain stayed until further orders) is in this order 39 application is also allowed how i get clarification you make me clear or how get clarity of this order

Follow Query

Report Abuse

kavksatyanarayana (Expert) 07 August 2021
Vague query. When the Hon'ble SC issued orders, what is your doubt as it is not clear. Consult a local lawyer.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Graduation while being govt job holder
File pertaining to a letter of administration
Property transfer related
Calling of witness
Right to vote and right to contest rwa elections
Writ petition.
Advocate not appearing
Dv and maintenance case
Tenant vacating, what all needs to be put in writing
Stamp duty

Vacation judge
Legal notice used for harrasment
Settlement
What is the meaning of possession (legally) of apartment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content
Validity of legal notice.....