Supreme court for hsa amendment 2005
abcdefg
(Querist) 18 January 2014
This query is : Resolved
In Oct 2011,Supreme court in case of Ganduri koteshwaramma...(judgement is available on www.indiankanoon.org)has given equal shares in property to daughters with sons on basis of HSA amendment 2005.Though father of daughters had expired in 1993(i.e.before HSA amendment 2005 coming into force),daughters are given equal shares on basis of HSA amendment 2005.
In another case of Sheela devi....(judgement is available on www.indiankanoon.org),supreme court said that benefit of HSA amendment 2005 can't be given to daughter as father had expired before HSA amendment 2005 coming into force.
Now,tell me,which judgement is more correct? judgement in case of Ganduri? or
judgement in case of Sheela Devi? and how?
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 18 January 2014
consult local lawyer.
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 18 January 2014
Not only this, the verdict of the SC may contradict in many cases. You have take up the decision of the relevant case, superior bench etc.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 18 January 2014
Both judgements are correct and applicable till decided otherwise by the higher bench.
P. Venu
(Expert) 19 January 2014
The facts and the law and principles are clearly distinguishable. Please study the judgments carefully.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 20 January 2014
Both the judgments will relate to that particular case only so the outward differences noted may not find a place when both of them are perused properly.
