Voice recordings are admissible.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 28 June 2011
This query is : Resolved
Voice recordings are admissible in evidence and as same wait as other documentary evidence. Go through
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 1314 "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam v. L. K. Tripathi"
AIR 1986 SUPREME COURT 3 "Ram Singh v. Col. Ram Singh"
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3820 "State (N. C. T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu"
AIR 1975 SUPREME COURT 1788 "Ziyauddin Burhanuddin Bukhari v. Brijmohan Ramdass Mehra"
AIR 1973 SUPREME COURT 157 "R. M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra"
AIR 1964 SUPREME COURT 72 "S. Partap Singh v. State of Punjab"
Also any case which say that photocopy only are not admissible it's negative are also required along with the original photocopy duly attested by the competent authority?
But in this who is the competent authority.
case law required.
requesting the can LD member that if u have the case law above mentioned than paste in this forum not available under the indiankanoon.org
Guest
(Expert) 28 June 2011
Yes, it is admissible.
It has to be authentic (in case the other party objects that it is not her voice you should be in a position to prove beyond any reasonable doubt.)
For knowing Back to Basic visit this thread:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/mobile/articles/display_article_list_mobile.asp?article_id=1955
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 29 June 2011
Sir thanks for the answer
Photo & photocopy both Also any case which say that photocopy & photo only are not admissible it's negative are also required along with the original photocopy duly attested by the competent authority?
But who is the competent authority.
Also which case law says that negative is the must to prove that photo & photocopy both are perfect.
Thanks.
