LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Mistakes on lawyer on notice

(Querist) 16 September 2011 This query is : Resolved 
sir,
My lawyer sent a demand notice against the dishonored of cheque but he mistkes the cheque no on the notice. Can it be rectified?
prabhakar singh (Expert) 16 September 2011
There was no occasion to mention cheque no.,any way in my opinion ,it is a clerical error which should not be taken up just nowas you can explain it in your complaint/and/or/ chief.
Advocate Rajkumarlaxman (Expert) 17 September 2011
it can be rectified no need to worry at all. as well said it is a clerical mistake.
ashok kumar singh (Expert) 17 September 2011
agree with the expert opinions, thanks.
Advocate Bhartesh goyal (Expert) 17 September 2011
Mentioning only wrong number of cheque in notice does not effect the legality of notice if date,amount and other particulars of cheque are correct then you need not to worry it can be rectified in complaint.
Guest (Expert) 17 September 2011
ask your advocate to send a rejoinder notice it is enough
Guest (Expert) 17 September 2011
I agree with Shri S. Ganesan.
dev kapoor (Expert) 17 September 2011
Experts have rightly advised.I respectfully wish to add-
1.Clerical or typical errors are subject to correction provided they are provided bona fide;
2.corrigenda may involve legal complications;
3.If necessary, corrigendum may be sent after complaint is filed in which both typically erred no.and corrected no.are conspicuously mentioned;
4.Rest assured if there is other errata also then there may be legal complicacies and may be irreparable;
5.Notice once served forms the cause of action for lodging complaint & a second notice is barred.
These few things may be taken care of.The policy of law is to settle disputes, not to complicate things.
Shastri J.K. (Expert) 17 September 2011
I agree with the expert opinions.
Rajesh (Expert) 18 September 2011
I AM AGREE WITH MR.PRABHAKAR SINGH,see--typographical error in--1-c.n.harikrishan v/s signatory,mr.p.iyyappan raj,crl.o.p.no.311139/2002 dec.on 21/11/2003(madras hc) &2-messers krishna kumar vinod kumar & 3others cr.r.no.1963/2002 decided on 24/09/2003(allahabad hc)
Sailesh Kumar Shah (Expert) 18 September 2011
Mr. Sushovit
Provide case law as posted by Expert Mr. Rajesh, as and when require.
girish shringi (Expert) 19 September 2011
You can improve the notice by sending fresh annexure to the "Notice",which can serve the purpose.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :