Bail from ndps act
Kamal
(Querist) 26 April 2012
This query is : Resolved
7 accuses A1 to A7
A1 & A2 are illicit trafficking psychotropic drug in other countries
A3 to A6 have supplied stock to A1 and A1 does not carrying drug licenses with him.
A3 to A6 are carrying the proper dl
Chargesheet are raised and given to all of them.
a3 to a6 are under provision of Sec22 and 28 of ndps act
Chargesheet is filed....
Now to how to get bail..
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 26 April 2012
Dear Kamal,
Sections 20(b)(1) to 28 are all non bailable uner the NDPS Act 1985.Hence it is very difficult for any of the A's to get bail.
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 26 April 2012
Chances are very poor for getting bail.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 26 April 2012
Chances are poor till CS is filed.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
Deepak Nair
(Expert) 26 April 2012
Very difficult to get bail.
Kamal
(Querist) 26 April 2012
i know it is difficult but any way
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 26 April 2012
Try your luck..highlight the weakness of the case
ajay sethi
(Expert) 26 April 2012
www.indiankanoon.org/doc/510640
Bombay High Court
Union Of India vs Jagdish Singh And Anr on 17 February, 2011
Bench: J. H. Bhatia
T
1 Cri.Appln. No.1405.10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1405 OF 2010
Union of India .. Applicant.
Vs.
Jagdish Singh and Anr. .. Respondents.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5718 OF 2010
Union of India .. Applicant.
Vs.
Harvinder Singh and Anr. .. Respondents.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5719 OF 2010
Union of India .. Applicant.
Vs.
G.Samuel @ Anna @ Raju & Anr. .. Respondents. WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5722 OF 2010
Union of India .. Applicant.
Vs.
Anil Kumar Menon @ Allen
and Anr. .. Respondents.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5725 OF 2010
Union of India .. Applicant.
Vs.
2 Cri.Appln. No.1405.10
Harjinder Ram and Anr. .. Respondents. WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5726 OF 2010
Union of India .. Applicant. Vs.
Veer Bahadur Singh and Anr. .. Respondents. Shri F.E.Saldanha, Ms.Revati Mohite Dere alongwith Ms.Smita Deokar and Mandar Goswami, Spl. P.P., for the applicant. Shril Anil G.Lalla alongwith Mr.Sunil Ghadge for respondent no.1 in Cri. Appln. No.1405 of 2010 and Appln. No.5725 of 2010. Shri Ayaz Khan for respondent no.1 in Cri.Appln. No.5718 of 2010 and Cri. Appln. No.5722 of 2010.
Ms.Sartaj Shaikh for respondent no.1 in Cri.Appln. No.5719 of 2010. Shri Dilip Mishra for respondent no.1 in Cri.Appln. No.5726 of 2010. Ms.A.T.Javeri, A.P.P., for respondent no.2 - State. CORAM : J.H.BHATIA, J.
DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2011.
From the language of Section 22, it becomes clear that whoever manufactures, possesses as well as purchases, transports, imports inter-State, export inter-State or uses any psychotropic substance shall be punished if any such act is done in contravention of any provisions of the NDPS Act OR any rule OR order made under the Act OR in contravention of any conditions of the licence granted to him
Taking into consideration huge quantity which is much beyond the limits of commercial quantity also and the revelation made during the investigation that accused no.3 was regularly dealing with export of psychotropic substances from India and that accused nos.1 and 2 were assisting him, no case is made out to grant bail to them
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 26 April 2012
try with support provided by Mr.Sethi.
