Arms act

Bala shankar (Querist) 20 July 2012 This query is : Resolved
the accused is charged u/s 25(1-B)r/w sec.3 of arms act 1959. is it necessary to examine the ballistic expert to prove the charge for the prosecution.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

V R SHROFF (Expert) 21 July 2012
If necessary to prove, yes.
What is your aim??

Bala shankar (Querist) 23 July 2012
my aim is to get conviction

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Uds sale by flatpromotors
Registered sale agreement
Sale of property agreement not executed
Criminal law
Get back money from a scam through report cyber hunters
Cheque bounce case
Overhead water tank
Wrongfully name removed from pr card
Lost property agreement need non traceable certificate
How i won a million dollars

Vacation judge
Legal notice used for harrasment
Settlement
What is the meaning of possession (legally) of apartment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content
Validity of legal notice.....