Police inaction and further shoddy investigation.
pramod
(Querist) 07 January 2013
This query is : Resolved
Respected Experts,
Kindly guide on the following situations;
1.Police hand-in- glove with local goon with bit of a political support. Thus bypassed law, in the private interest.
2.Five accused have been charged under sections of 143, 147,148, 341, 323, 324, 308 r/w 149 of IPC, dated 16th February, 2012, for the crime committed against a bus driver, in a public place, grievously inflicted bodily injuries, reason traffic commotion. The case charge sheet-ed against Accused No: 1 & 2. Accused No: 1 taken bail, after period of one month in absconding. No: 2 is still absconding i.e. a son of accused No: 1. No: 3 to 5 accused are identifiable but remarked as not known but absconding. Incident was witnessed by cleaner and conductor of the bus and the same is reported in the F.I.R. Accused No: 1 is a known political goon; Police were hand-in- glove with accused No: 1 to hush up the matter.
3.Final report submitted to Honarable Magistrate dated on17th May, 2012. Till today Police have not brought anything on record or produced about the identifiable accused No: 2 to 5. Investigation is under shoddiness. The F.I.R. and the FINAL Police Report to Magistrate did not mentioned and provided anything about the details of investigation and the same is very much silent.
4.A third person lodged a petition in a separate issue of incident against the same accused No’s: 1, 3, 4 & 5, who were involved in the crime against the bus driver for an apprehension of house tress pass with threat to life and property by the same culprit, in the same Police station on 9th May( Third person has no connection with driver, conductor and cleaner of the bus) The said petition also have mentioned all details of atrocities of the accused No:1,3,4 & 5 and also in detail mentioned about the commission of crime which took place against the bus driver with all these five accused along with their name and address to the said Police station in the written petition, much before the submission of the charge sheet to the concerned Honarable Magistrate, as habitual offenders as an intimation to Police in the every own petition. The date of third party petition filed on 9th May, 2012, the statement of third person’s petition was taken along with all other four accused who were mentioned in the petition for an apprehension of house trespass. They all were called to Police station and statements were adduced by the Police dated on 11th May 2012. Police. And Police warned the culprits and instructed them to keep away from indulging any sort of threat to the third person towards house trespass. Meanwhile, the third person come to know that the Police literally have made fictitious narration of the incident of crime against the bus driver and made accused No: 3 to 5 were general public but identifiable. Thus favored illegally accused No: 1 to save other main culprits of the crime away from the investigation. Thus substantial injustices have been profoundly seemed to be committed. Constrained by the act of Police Third person put up an application under RTI Act. Evasive answers received and information sought under the application refused. Matter pending before Honarable State Commission.
5.Therefore, humbly request you, all Respective Experts to contribute the right amount of method for initiating appropriate procedures against Police for their inaction and illegal activities. Thus third person could get an order for re-investigation of the said crime against the habitual offenders. Along with further advice to initiate legal actions against these Police personal through higher officials of the same department on the grounds of departmental enquirers.
Thanking you all for your valuable contribution.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 07 January 2013
Move an application before the trial magistrate under section 173 (8) of Criminal Procedure code for re-investigation of the case from a impartial senior police officer.
