Alimony

Rajan (Querist) 10 January 2013 This query is : Resolved
Respected Sirs,

A good friend of mine who is appearing as party in person, has completed the cross examination as she has contridicted her won statements in the early petition and also her own statements in the proof affidavit. Also certain hospital documents, police station documents and High court documents were also contradicted by herself.

She has accepted that she never knew anything about the petititoner, his education or his job or his salary or nothing but agreed for marriage. Does this attract and be proved as she was forced into marriage?

She also accepted that she printed wrong names and also printed as doctor when she was not fully qualifed to be a doctor. Will her acceptance prove that she cheated the petitioner?

She also denied receiving certain documents as the same was acknowledged in her petition and part of the case was based on such letter received by her, can this be proved as her false evidence?

She claims to have gone to the police station for restitution of conjugal rights, when she received the lawyers notice. But she didnt submit the copy to prove her claim but in police station the petitioner was informed of dowry harassment for 50,000 rupees, petiitoner went to high court for anticipatory abil, can this be proved as false harassment?

She wrote a letter to the brother in law and father in law that she was happy and enjoying life with petitioner but in all her petitions she claimed that she was not happy and she was illtreated. But she agreed in court that the letter was writen to her and she was happy and enjoying life and no ill treatment was done, will this also go against her for her false allegatiomns?

She contradicted almost all the statements in her petition and answered negative with contridiction at cross examination, will these proof go against her?

please advice

Follow Query

Report Abuse