per se admissibility of judgement

Vijay Kumar (Querist) 22 July 2013 This query is : Resolved

Certified Copy of Judgement of a court of law is admissible in evidence without formal proof.

Under which provision of law is it permitted?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Nadeem Qureshi (Expert) 22 July 2013
Dear Querist
as per section 63 of Indian Evidence act certified copy is applicable read the section 63 of IEA
63. Secondary Evidence -

Secondary evidence means and includes.

1. Certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained;

2. Copies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves insure the accuracy of the copy and copies compared with such copies;

3. Copies made from or compared with the original;

4. Counterparts of documents as against the parties who did not execute them;

5. Oral accounts of the contents of a document given by some person who has himself seen it.

Illustrations

(a) A photograph of an original is secondary evidence of its contents, though the two have not been compared, if it is proved that the thing photographed was the original.

(b) A copy compared with a copy of a letter made by copying machine is secondary evidence of the contents of the letter, if it is shown that the copy made by the copying machine was made from the original.

(c) A copy transcribed from a copy, but afterwards compared with the original, is secondary evidence, but the copy not so compared is not secondary evidence of the original, although the copy from which it was transcribed was compared with the original.

(d) Neither an oral account of a copy compared with the original, nor an oral account of a photo graph or machine copy of the original, is secondary evidence of the original.

COMMENTS

Admissibility

Application moved for permission to lead secondary evidence based on ground of loss of document. Presence of document proved from the facts pleaded – Allowing secondary evidence not illegal; Sobha Rani v. Ravikumar, AIR 1999 P&H 21.

Tape-recorded statements are admissible in evidence; K.S. Mohan v. Sandhya Mohan, AIR 1993 Mad 59.

Certified copies of money lender’s licences are admissible in evidence;

K. Shivalingaiah v. B.V. Chandrashekara Gowda, AIR 1993 Kant 29.

prabhakar singh (Expert) 22 July 2013
Just have a labor pain and chew as doze section 74 of evidence Act,promise you would get cured.

prabhakar singh (Expert) 22 July 2013
Then certified copies of all public documents are admissible in evidence.

Adv Archana Deshmukh (Expert) 22 July 2013
Judgment of a court is a public document hence it is admissible in evidence u/s 74 of Evid Act.

Vijay Kumar (Querist) 22 July 2013
Thanks Adv Archana.
You have cleared my mind. As it does have the character of public document, it does not require formal proof.