LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

138 nia act 1881

(Querist) 01 December 2013 This query is : Resolved 
Sir
I had filed a complainant under under 138 of NIA ACT 1881. on 22/9/2011At the time of chief examination the advocate for the Accused deposited the cheque and also pleaded guilt on 30/11/2013. This happen after about the case being posted for more than 30 times The accused was left free without awarding any punishment . Can any advocate tell is this right .what can I do against this this has happen at Majistrate court ottapalam in kerala state
V R SHROFF (Expert) 01 December 2013
Ur advocate must insist on punishment, and refuse to take payment at this point of time.
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 01 December 2013
agree with the advise of expert VR SHROFF ji.
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 02 December 2013
The offence stands committed by the accused person so despite of deposit of the amount of the cheque, the court shall have to decide the case on merits.
prakash vka (Querist) 02 December 2013
THe case was not decide on the merits In this case the accused got a time period of three years to pay the said .amount if such orders are passed by the court. the value of cheq is lost
ajay sethi (Expert) 02 December 2013
at least you have received principal amount of cheque . what would you have gained if accused was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment and did not pay cheque amount .
malipeddi jaggarao (Expert) 03 December 2013
Agreed with Mr.Ajay Sethi.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :