LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Compromise u/s 420

(Querist) 25 October 2015 This query is : Resolved 
Accused - X (Present in court) Y & Z ( P O) Complainants - A, B, C, D, E CASE STATUS - A & B came to record their statements for prosecution evidence. C & D never came despite of several summons. E Took his complaint back at the starting of investigation by Police Accused X convicted with R.I of 3 years u/s 420 Appeal pending before sessions judge. A, B & X are interested for compromise. Query - Is compromise between A, B & X permissible? What are the chances of FIR quashing in High Court? Can D & E come up again in Sessions Court and demand for compromise money?
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 25 October 2015
please state facts clearly. Do not frame question paper of LLB with algebra
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 25 October 2015
repeated

http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Compromise-u-s-420-567356.asp
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 27 October 2015
No reply if query repeated.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :