suggestion plz

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 24 February 2011 This query is : Resolved
kind sir/madam

my sister filled DV case against my brother-in-law and his family.

in interim order court passed not to generate third party in matrimonial home. but respondent family against the order created third party and absconded.

i know that family is innocent but they are not not permitting my sister to stay and not giving any maintenance.

my query is what court will do?
1) is new purchaser is liable to stay in that flat?

2) will court pass summons against the respondents and keep the the case aside.?

3) or that flat will be sealed by court or allow my sister to stay in that flat?

plz suggest me as we dont want to keep our sister with us but cant leave her in this state also?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Dayananda Gowda (Expert) 24 February 2011
You are not stated the interim order passed exparte or after contest by respondents.

If the order is exparte order, suggest your sister to give notice to respondent about the order.

The respondents have a knowledge of the order, suggest her to file application under 31 of dv act

Ajay Bansal (Expert) 24 February 2011
PLEASE TELL WHO IS OWNER OF MATRIMONIAL HOME.IF SAME IS OWNED BY ANY FEMALE,THEN SAID STAY DESERVES TO BE VACATED.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries