High Court decision.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 23 April 2011
This query is : Resolved
Dear Friends Of the Forum,
Recently,one Bench of High court in a W.A. in W.P; gave a judgement, and facts of the case is as explained below.
An Inamdar and tenant where fighting on ownership of the land, which was given on lease,to Army by the Inamdar for ten years in the year 1963 and subsequently it was extended for some more time/term. In a sudden change of turn now the Army claims the ownership of the land citing a clause in Inam abolition act AP (Telangana area) right to hold/ Vesting on date(s) Viz : (20-07-1955) and 01-11-1973. And AP HIGH COURT upheld the Army's claim and pronounced the Judgement in their favour.
Actually ARMY is ( as a lease holder)holding the land as a lease holder ( given to them by Inamdar). How can a lease holder, and that to A Central Government (ARMY !) Organisation can do this to a law abiding citizen, and COURT supporting this action ( of THE ARMY)?
Dear EXPERTS OF THE FORUM KINDLY SHOW ME A WAYOUT to over come this problem, I need a quick reply/ solution PLEASE.
[If some wants to help me i will send the compleate details/ judgement copy, to his/her Email please.]
Thanking YOU ALL in advance, expecting an early reply PLEASE.
