Why p.menu sir said that there is no need to file wp
S Kumar
(Querist) 21 July 2014
This query is : Resolved
Dear lawyers
In my last query P Menu sir advice me that there is no need to file WP against WP of company.
What does it mean.
Isn't this mean that I am myself leaving my claim of reinstatement with backwages
or P Menu sir is suggesting that a reply in form of a counter reply to their Wp where I pray HC for reinstatement with full backwages will be sufficient?
One more thing as their is a section 36 in IDAct to restrict practicing advocates is there any section under which I request HC not to allow a lawyer since I am pursuing my case individually.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 21 July 2014
please continue the earlier thread. I could not understand the reference you are talking about.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 21 July 2014
Well, his name is P.Venu, not P.Menu. Address him correctly.
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 21 July 2014
ID act restrict advocates only during the proceedings before the labour officers.
malipeddi jaggarao
(Expert) 22 July 2014
Contact expert Mr.P.Venu by sending a private message to him.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 22 July 2014
Continue in the same thread or send private message to P Venu sir.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 22 July 2014
continue in same thread
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 22 July 2014
can't understand. pl contact concerned person. Pl treat any advise in confidence.. , not in public unless replied here.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 23 July 2014
Confine to your original query. The advice of Mr. Venu is correct.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 24 July 2014
Your query has been properly addressed in that thread itself, you may visit that again.
Guest
(Expert) 24 July 2014
Whatever is your query for Mr. Menu that should have been posted in the original thread, not independently.
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup