False fir u/s 307 and 354 ipc filed by the complainant
sweety f
(Querist) 11 July 2012
This query is : Resolved
HELLO SIR,
I AM THE COMPLAINANT AND WITH DURESS, THREAT N PRESSURE FROM THE, NEIGHBOURS, VESTED INTEREST PEOPLE AND THE COPS, I REGD A FALSE FIR U/S 307 AND 354 OF IPC AGAINST MY EMPLOYER.
NOW I M REPENTING N I HAVE REALIZED WHAT R THE COSEQUENCES N THAT I HAVE RUINED THE LIFE OF A GEM OF A SINCERE N TRUTHFUL PERSON WHO HAD DONE SO MUCH TO ME AND MY WHOLE FAMIL SON N DAUGHTER TO COMPLETE THEIR HIGHER EDUCATION. HE FINANCED AND HELPED MY SICK PARENTS, SISTERS, N OTHER FLY MEMBERS. HE FINANCED US IN LAKHS TO GET RID OF THE DEBTS N PAY THE LOANS.
HOWEVER NOW I WANT TO WITHDRAW THE COMPALINT AGAINST THE EMPLOYER N WANT TO RENDER HIM JUSITICE.
*****NB******: PLS ADVICE WHAT SHOULD I DO. WHOM N WHERE SHOULD I APPROACH. WHAT R THE PROCEDURES. WILL THE COPS ARREST ME. OR THE COURT GOING TO PUNISH ME FOR FILING A FALSE FIR. PLS ADVICE STEP BY STEP N WITH SIMPLIFICATION. REGSRDS
Nadeem Qureshi
(Expert) 11 July 2012
Dear Sweety
It is not possible to withdraw the complaint with any harm to you, if you except that you are under pressure of someone and filed this false complaint against him. he can be filed a case against you u/s 211, 182, 195 Of IPC, you should settled the matter amicably outside the court and file this settlement before the court with a written application before the court for settlement of the case. if the Hon'ble court think fit then only the court allow your application and pass an order to compound the case.
Feel free to call
Adv.R.P.Chugh
(Expert) 11 July 2012
You can take the case back, even though S.307 is not compoundable means legally speaking, strictly it cannot be ended on a compromise, however the current trend as reflected in a catena of Supreme COurt and High Courts decisions, is that on the basis of compromise the high court can quash teh FIR u/s 482 of the CrPC, and no penal consequences would follow if you are the only witness of the offence normally, because in that case if they proceed with prosecution even when you are reluctant, no purpose would be served as in any case you'd turn hostile at time of trial, so it stands to reason and common sense that it should be ended without state being made to incur a lot of expense of prosecution etc.
ashutosh mishra
(Expert) 11 July 2012
The basic theme behind compoundable and non compoundable is that if the offense is against individual or against state?????
But chief bigad kar sab possible hai dear.
ashutosh mishra
(Expert) 11 July 2012
The basic theme behind compoundable and non compoundable is that if the offense is against individual or against state?????
But chief bigad kar sab possible hai dear.
sweety f
(Querist) 11 July 2012
HELLO SIR,
I HAVE NOT UNDERSTOOD UR REPLY TO MY QUERY GIVEN BELOW. PLS EXPLAIN IN SIMPLE AND COMMON MAN LANGUAGE.
REGARDS
The basic theme behind compoundable and non compoundable is that if the offense is against individual or against state?????
But chief bigad kar sab possible hai dear.
modassir nasim
(Expert) 12 July 2012
ashutosh means to say examination in chief i.e. ur evidence. offences r non compoundable means it cannot be compromised .he will be released if u r unable to proof ur case.talk to him taking him in confidence.
JANAK RAJ VATSA
(Expert) 15 July 2012
well advised by the ld experts. but act soonest to get rid of the sin which you have committed against an innocent person
