it act and 376 IPC
ninoanand
(Querist) 04 October 2017
This query is : Resolved
Hi All members Thanks to all of you who replied upon my query last time but further I have a question in continuation of that case. The rape victim sent multiple abusive messages to her Rapist after rape. Its already delayed in filing rape complaint. She has not yet filed the complaint as she is under psychiatric treatment. If she files the rape complaint against her rapist doctor will victim also has to go jail for sending him abusive messages ? This matter is of 2015 still no FIR filed as she is under mental treatment and highly scared and no support.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 04 October 2017
You should have posted query in the same previous thread.
She has chances to get benefit of depression, if proved.
Guest
(Expert) 04 October 2017
Vague academic question. The question is, what specific concern you have with the case? Also, if you have thanked the experts on their last advice, what was your object to post the present query in a separate thread that too without providing link of the original thread?
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 04 October 2017
The victim is in turmoil and under psychiatric treatment.
It is not clear you are asking for whom; victim or perpetuator of crime!
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 04 October 2017
As confirmed by you also that similar query has been resolved.
Similar query has been discussed in many threads that you can ‘SEARCH’ in ‘SEARCH’ option on middle of right hand side of this web page in Experts section and in ‘SEARCH’ option on bottom of right hand side of the web page in Form section…………….
You can also ‘SEARCH in other sections e.g; Articles, Judgments, Files………… And download even citations, judgments, procedures etc etc ……… Avoid posting photos/names/email id/phone numbers/addresses etc etc or attaching any document containing photos/names/email id/phone numbers/addresses etc etc and erase photos/names/email id/phone numbers/addresses etc etc while sending any documents to anyone, anywhere except your own very able senior LOCAL counsel of unshakable repute and integrity specializing in such/civil matters and having successful track record in handling such matters thru courts of law and with concerned authorities …
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 04 October 2017
3rd post from top i.e. from query in the thread and below post of Senior Expert Mr. Rajendra K Goyal is nothing but chronic affliction of vague, vagueness in addition to many other ideoptahies...............
Guest
(Expert) 04 October 2017
@ Mr. Kumar Doab,
Are you really a legal expert and if so, with what legal quaslifications?
If Mr. Kumar Does not have any practical solution, what was the use of making such a vague post suggesting him to search on the internet. Had he been able to search, there was no need for him to ask the experts here.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 05 October 2017
Expert JIGYASU - Legal analyst,
In which capacity are you asking whether any expert is legal expert or not?.
If as querist post the question as query.
If as expert, send PM to admin. to verify.
Try to maintain decorum.
Try to contribute if you can.
P. Venu
(Expert) 05 October 2017
Yes, Mr. Jigyasu has been too officious in being judgmental of the querists as well the Learned Experts. This certainly could be avoided.
However, my Learned friends, Mr. Rajendra Goal and Mr.Kumar Doab can do much in salvaging the situation. I trust they have the magnanimity to rise above the mediocrity. It is my humble opinion that, being the leaders among the Experts, they owe the responsibility to be the torchbearers.
Guest
(Expert) 05 October 2017
@Rajendra K Goyal,
With reference to your query, I ask you the same question, in which capacity you have asked me the question, when I desired to know about Mr. Kumar Doab? No objection, if you can certify that Mr. Kumar Doab is really a legal expert and also with which qualification?
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 08 October 2017
Provide full facts of the case or use previous thread to know relevant information asked by you.
However, instead of unnecessarily stretching the same issue, just being it is FREE OF COST, you can/should have approached and consulted a local lawyer.
Guest
(Expert) 08 October 2017
@Mr. P.Venu,
I would not mind admitting that about you I was in a sheer misunderstanding that you would have been a sensible person. But, your statement “yes Mr. Jigyasu has been too OFFICIOUS in being judgmental of the querists as well as the learned experts,” makes me realize that I was wrong in taking you as a sensible person
For your information, when without any comment on action or the character of a person, someone like you indulges in to the affairs of others, the sensible persons treat that as undue interference and in crude language that is also known as poking of nose by the interfering person. Had you been sensible even to some extent, you could well have given thought over what I asked and why from the fake experts, who just play the number game by making vague posts, instead of any purposeful advice.
Irrespective of your partial knowledge, I used to respect due to the reason that sometimes, you provide appropriate advice to the querists, though not always. But, I wonder, on which specific ground you have come to the support of two fake experts, who believe only in posting merely vague, irrelevant, misleading and sidetracking posts that too in plenty.
Further, if along with that undue indulgence, if any person, targeting one of the two parties by deliberately keeping his eyes closed on the misdeeds and loads of abuses of the other party (Mr. Kumar Doab) and expresses a predisposition or a preconceived opinion that prevents anyone from impartially evaluating facts that have been presented for determination, in legal language, that is perhaps called a bias and prejudice of that person. If you are a legal expert, you could well have given proper thought over that fact before making unwarranted derogatory comments against me and my post, which was never aimed at you.
Still further, if someone like you, makes derogatory and disparaging statement against that targeted party even on his rational approach, in legal language, that is perhaps considered as defamation of the targeted party.
If you don't mind, WOULD YOU LIKE TO CONFIRM IF these two persons had been seen giving any real advice of its worth to anyone even in 10% of their posts. When asked to clarify, instead of justifying their stand for the correct guidance for one and all, they just try to evade from the question by sidetracking the issue. The extreme happens on the part of Mr. Kumar Doab, who immediately starts hurling abuses through several posts at a stretch on the same thread, instead of reconciling on the wrong advice given by him, may be deliberately or out of his sheer ignorance of law.
It is only due to your very limited knowledge about law, you have treated Mr. Rajendra K Goyal and Kumar Doab, as your learned friends. Here you have proved that that you are unable to distinguish, who is a learned person (expert) and who depends mostly on bluffs of the self styled experts, who mislead and misguide the gullible querists without any reserve..
So, for as your observation is concerned, you have done nothing, except making a very objectionable remark against me stating, "Yes, Mr. Jigyasu has been too OFFICIOUS in being judgmental of the quertists as well as the learned experts, which is worth taking exception to. CAN I ASK ONE PERTINENT QUESTION TO YOU that if on asking Mr. Kumar Doab, whether he is really an expert or not, I have been declared as officious by you, in your own opinion, what Mr. Kumar Doab would have been when through his innumerous posts, he asked one expert, “you are instructed” or “you are ordered,” or so, as I was compelled to go through several of his contributions due to his very strange attitude adopted very often in several threads towards some experts? DO YOU REALLY CLOSE YOUR EYES ON THEIR STATEMENT?
IF YOU HAVE TRIED TO CONVENIENTLY IGNORE ALL THESE FACTS, SORRY TO SAY, YOU DON'T GET ANY MORAL RIGHT TO GIVE ANY ADVICE, AT LEAST TO ME. In that case, you can judge yourself whether you are a sensible person, expert, an impartial person or otherwise?
I am an analyst and a learner also, while you act as an expert at the LCI. I try to analyse the advice of the experts, particularly such type of experts, who believe only in making vague posts with the intention to play merely number games to falsely mount on the top of the experts in the hall of fame. I have very clearly suggested Mr. Rajendra K Goyal to be a real expert, rather than playing a number game. But, he continues with the same tactics for the reasons best known to him. About Mr. Doab, I have understood well that he can never make any mend in himself to avoid deliberately misleading the querists.
Being a learner, I hate learning false things, which the duo Mr. Kumar Doab and Rajendra K Goyal do intentionally. So, I don't think I am wrong in alerting the querists about any wrong advice by anyone, who usually come to the experts’ forum to get correct advice.
But, I wonder, how as an expert you prefer to close your eyes over the activities of the fake experts like Mr. Rajendra K Goyal and Mr. Kumar Doab, who don't give any serious thought that a layman loses his legal fight only due to misconception infused in his mind due to wrong and misleading advice given by such type of self styled experts. I respect those experts, who really render some meaningful practical advice, but I don't prefer to do some formality to falsely appreciate such persons, like Mr. Kumar Doab and Mr. Goyal do by mutually appreciating each other's misleading advice just to in a vain bid to convince the querists that only they are the real experts, as if all others are idiots. I very well know that whenever both these fake experts try to dominate over all others with their wrong and misleading advice with corroboration of the other associate, some very intelligent and experienced experts avoid wasting their time to advice the querists.
So now, you may better give some thought why you strike your head for these two fellows, when they are open defiants in all respects with the sole aim to dominate over the LCI and all experts as well as the querists.
IN FACT, YOU HAVE LOST YOUR OWN CREDIBILITY & IMAGE BY MAKING SUCH AN UNWARRANTED DEROGATORY STATEMENT ON YOUR PART WITHOUT HAVING EVEN ANY REMOTE CONCERN, THAT TOO IN SUPPORT OF THE FAKE EXPERTS.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 October 2017
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Issue-transfer-memorandum-657746.asp
IT=@PSD has accepted that it has been hiding behind IT’s multiple fake ID’s some of which have
been blackened/blacklisted/shunted out……………..one being 3rd post in the thread below the 1st
post of Senior Expert Mr.Rajendra K Goyal and that has been properly responded by Mr.Rajendra K
Goyal in 9th post from top , another 7th/8th In the thread, another being 10th in the thread showing (
changed) photo of the same old, disturbed entity i.e.
IT=@PSD..................the habitual abuser that posts nothing else but IT’s=@PSD’s daily
TRDAEMARK TAMASHA, NUISANCE AND ABUSE, nothing else.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 October 2017
One fake ID that popped up from some Road in Abu Dhabi……………doubted to be fund provider
for criminal/terrorist operations from tribal bad lands of Pakistan……….and shunted out.
One is frantically asking querists in all threads to call him and pay consultations fees and pointed out
by members/experts..
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 October 2017
In this thread also IT=@PSD has posted nothing else and IT’s=@PSD’s contribution is NIL, Zero.
Form all multiple fake ID’s IT=@PSD has been daily and from Day1, quarrelling, attacking, abusing,
querists, authors, members, Experts, LCI, LCI admin and littering IT’s=@PSD’s TRDAEMARK
TAMASHA, NUISANCE AND ABUSE, sarcasm, nothing else.
ON the top of that IT=@PSD desires internally and privately everyone to have endless, infinite,
generosity to tolerate IT’s=@PSD’s TRDAEMARK TAMASHA, NUISANCE AND ABUSE, sarcasm.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 October 2017
IT=@PSD is in NO capacity to ask anything from anyone, comment on anyone.
IT=@PSD is to shun,give up permanently, IT's-@PSD's hallucination that IT is some ordinary master in some tribal school under open sky.......
IT=@PSD in any of IT's multiple fake ID's was never anything, anyone,anybody at LCI.
IT=@PSD any of IT's multiple fake ID's is not anything, anyone,anybody at LCI.
IT=@PSD any of IT's multiple fake ID's will never be anything, anyone,anybody at LCI.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 09 October 2017
Today also, as usual, from all multiple fake ID's in this thread and all threads contribution of IT=@PSD is NIL, ZERO.
Guest
(Expert) 10 October 2017
Five absolutely vague posts by Mr. Kumart Doab. His posts clearly reveal as if he has gone berserk.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 10 October 2017
The last post by postor/impostor in last post above may last post i.e. another of multiple Fake ID's of IT=@PSD is another abuse, after all abuse in all posts to all Experts in this thread, as usual.
IT=@PSD has been doing it from day1.
Guest
(Expert) 12 October 2017
how shamelessly, an imposter, Kumar Doab, declares others as imposters, while never clarified, who is IT=@PSD, even on asking several times.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 12 October 2017
IT=@PSD,
Shameless ( Besharam) , ill informed ( Nalayak), MoorkhaNand ( IT's own favorite word), MoorkhNandan ( IT's own favorite word), has been posting from Day1 misleading, dilatory posts.
At the cost of repeating; IT's memory refreshed again.
IT=@PSD has accepted that it has been hiding behind IT’s multiple fake ID’s some of which have
been blackened/blacklisted/shunted out…
Now GO away, get lost.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 12 October 2017
IT's=@PSD's contribution at LCI from day 1 has been NIL,ZERO.
Anyone that has paid any monies against wrong, erroneous posts of poorly informed IT=@PSD may post back.
Guest
(Expert) 12 October 2017
Mr. Kumar Doab (unreal name) by posting two abusive posts has very clearly revealed his disturbed mind, when he could not justify his earlier multiples of irrelevant and vague posts.
