Legal advice
dipankar
(Querist) 12 April 2014
This query is : Resolved
in brief our case is like this 'our trust has been dissolved by the district court of pune way back in 2002. however things continued to function as it is (as the matter was hushed up!) and not many were aware of it. the ex chairman was a very well respected social & political dignitary and his arrest was not carried out due to political connections at the top levelin 2002. the judgement of the district court pronounced the ex chairman as fraud and liable to be arrested. he continued till death. no one wished to oppose him.
from 2006, interestingly we got a 'new chairman' (of a trust that does not even exist!. he is a crafty man, who is fully aware of the 2002 judgement and the stay by the mumbai high court in 2011. but now a case has been registered by the original owners of the property (to which the trust belonged) on the 'fake' chairman. the case is going on strong in the Supreme Court. the currant 'self declared chairman' is also a politician but not of match of the ex chairman'.
my query is - from 2006-14 i have suffered a lot under the hands of the currant chairman. as i always opposed him. in case the Supreme Court decision comes in our favor, how can i nail the 'fake' chairman legally. i wish that an imposter should be punished for his misdeeds. i wish to mention that the Supreme Court matter concerns a national property in pune, in the name of the father of the nation.
ROHIT SHARMA
(Expert) 12 April 2014
Dear Mr. Dipankar,
1. Of course in case the Supreme Court decision comes in our favor, you can then always initiate a legal criminal action against such new self appointed Chairman impersonating himself as the Chairman of a fictitious trust and for his such act of commission of an offence of fraudulently claiming and to have interest in the property of an extinguished trust that belongs to the true owner of the property of a previously existing trust which incidentally was disbanded by the District Court way back in 2002, by creating a fictitious trust, so as to prevent the seizure of the property of such erstwhile trust and that of the true owner, which could have been fortified in execution as by the decree passed by such court in 2002 by filing a written complaint u/s 190 Cr.P.C. r/w u/s 207 of the I.P.C. before the court of Chief District Judicial Magistrate under whose jurisdiction such property in issue is situated.
2. Of course this is a free advise but further consultation would be paid ones.
3. If need be have a phone consultation with this lawyer.
With regards,
Adv. Rohit Sharma.
(B.Sc. L.L.B. L.L.M.)
(M) 0 9 8 2 4 0 4 7 9 7 1.
E-Mail : lawgate1349@gmail.com.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 13 April 2014
Let the decision of Sc come and the order be studied. In view of the SC judgement and case file concrete advise can be given. it is not advisable to guide without reading the case file having papers to the tune of 2 - 3 Kg.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 13 April 2014
Well advised by experts, wait for the judgment by supreme court for further proceedings.
