LIMITATION ACT
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 13 September 2010
This query is : Resolved
I AM HAVING ONE SHOP IN REGD. CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY SINCE 1991,I HAVE PAID ALL MAINT. CHARGES DEMANDED BY SOCIETY TILL MARCH 2005.I HAVE PAID 2 YEARS(1999-2000 & 2001)TO SOCIETY ,AS PER VERBAL REQUEST BY TREASURER OF THE SOCIETY & ONWARDS FOR 4 YEARS DIRECT TO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & SUBMITTED DETAILS TO SOCIETY.IN JUNE 2005 SOCIETY ISSUED ME A BILL DEMANDING PROPERTY TAX FOR 12 YEARS i.e.
(1991 TO 2003)AT DOUBLE THE ACTUAL TAX+ INTEREST.
PLEASE GUIDE ME WHETHER LIMITATION ACT APPLY OR NOT TO MY CASE. IS THERE ANY RULING IN SIMILAR CASE, PLEASE GIVE ME THE REFERENCE.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 13 September 2010
PLEASE TREAT THIS AS URGENT BECAUSE SOCIETY HAVE INITIATED ACTION UNDER CLAUSE 101 OF
M.C.S.ACT 1960.
Chanchal Nag Chowdhury
(Expert) 13 September 2010
Society cannot make a profit from property tax. If U have the docs. to show that U have deposited the tax properly, that itself is a discharge of your liability.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 13 September 2010
Society cannot frame its own rules contrary to State. The contents of the notice are against natural justice if the facts of your query are true. Serve a legal notice or make proper reply to the notice sent by society and demand to immediately withdraw notice sent to you failing which obtain stay order and challenge the notice.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 14 September 2010
THANK YOU SIR! FOR YOUR VALUABLE GUIDANCE
I SHALL BE OBLIGED IF SOMEONE GETS ME A JUDGMENT ON SIMILAR TYPE OF CASE.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 16 September 2010
SOCIETY HAD DEMANDED THE AMBIGUOUS AMOUNT IN 2005 WITH INTEREST THEREON & CARRY FORWARD AS OUTSTANDING FOR LAST 5 YEARS.ILL INTENTION
BEHIND THIS IS I CAN NOT SELL MY SHOP WITHOUT PAYMENT THIS FAKE & MANIPULATED DEMAND OF SOCIETY & TO THROTTLE MY VOICE AGAINST IRREGULARITIES BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE DY.REGISTRAR.AFTER LONG FOLLOW UP DY.REGISTRAR HAS ORDERED INSPECTION UNDER CLAUSE 89 A OF M.C.S. ACT 1960.
CAN I FILE CRIMINAL CASE UNDER 1.P.C. SECTION 23, 24,405,427&499 ? SHOULD I DO AGAINST OFFICE BEARERS OF SOCIETY OR AGAINST INDIVIDUALS IN THEIR PERSONAL CAPACITY ? PLEASE GUIDE ME IN THE MATTER.
