Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 10 October 2018
This query is : Resolved
In a civil case in lower court for declaring a registered deed as null and void under un due influence, issues framed but defendant filed IA under O7r11b stating in correct court fee. but lower court judge said under sec 34 of specific relief act any suit with out consequential relief claimed a bare declaration is not allowed, plaintiff not taken effort to rectify the error, so plaint rejected. Is this an Jurisdictional error and valid reason for civil revision petition in HC ? should plaintiff must have gone for Appeal and not civil revision, when appeal is possible in such cases can civil revision can be rejected saying plaintiff must have gone for Appeal only ? Thanks
Isaac Gabriel
(Expert) 11 October 2018
The query is from anonymous author.Whether you are plaintiff or respondent? What is the case? Post the query with your identity.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 11 October 2018
Anonymous author is not obliged by experts as per rules of this platform. Consult a local senior lawyer, if you are counsel in the instant suit. However, if you are located in Delhi and feel may contact me (on appointment between 2.30 pm to 8.30 pm) at: Ch. No 647, Dwarka Courts Complex, New Delhi Cell # 9891152939
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup