MV case

D S Shivappagoudar (Querist) 06 September 2009 This query is : Resolved
Karnataka State Road transport Corp.(KSRTC) had hired a pvt Bus on contract which met with accident. Claim pet.is filed by injured inmate and only the hired bus's insurer and owner is made respondent party. Is it necessary the KSRTC also should be made respondent?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Kiran Kumar (Expert) 06 September 2009
in opinion yes KSRTC is also a necessary party and should be impleaded as respondent.

Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Expert) 06 September 2009
no need to make KSRTC as a opposit party .
driver, insurence company,& the owner is lible for claim .
given contract of vehicle is the headace of owner of dt vehicle not yr.
go ahed............

Jithendra.H.J (Expert) 06 September 2009
make KSRTC as respondent you are going to loose nothing!

Adinath@Avinash Patil (Expert) 06 September 2009
KSRTC is necessary party,hence you should impleaded KSRTC as respondent.riven

Bhumik Dave (Expert) 07 September 2009
No its not important.riven

Sachin Bhatia (Expert) 10 October 2009
KSRTC is necessary party, and should impleaded KSRTC as respondent.

D S Shivappagoudar (Querist) 11 October 2009
thank all

D S Shivappagoudar (Querist) 11 October 2009
....

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries