Negligence of district magistrate to hold addl inquest u/s 176 (1) of cr pc.
JAIME
(Querist) 15 March 2016
This query is : Resolved
THAT THERE WERE SEVERAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE BODY OF THE DECEASED THAT ARE OMITTED FROM BEING RECORDED IN THE INQUEST PANCHANAMA BY THE POLICE INSPECTOR THE RELATIVE OF THE DECEASED APPROACHED THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE U/S 176 (1) OF CrPC. THE DISTRICT NEGLECTED THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INQUEST DUE TO INFLUENCE USED BY POLITICIANS TO DISALLOW ADDITIONAL INQUEST AS THE ADDITIONAL INQUEST BY RECORDING ALL THE OMITTED OBSERVATIONS FOUND IN THE STATE OF RIGOR MORTIS REVEAL THAT DEATH OCCURRED ON LAND AND THEN THE BODY WAS LET IN THE RIVER. THAT THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NEGLECTED TO HOLD ADDITIONAL INQUEST IS IT POSSIBLE TO SEEK DIRECTION OF HIGH COURT THROUGH A WRIT PETITION?
Adv. Yogen Kakade
(Expert) 15 March 2016
How are you connected to this case and what exactly you want?
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 15 March 2016
Orders need to be referred, consult senior lawyer.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 17 March 2016
Show the documents and orders to a local senior lawyer.
