Notice under regulation 49(ii) of derc supply code and performance standards regulations, 2007 dated
sandeep mathur
(Querist) 15 July 2013
This query is : Resolved
REF REPLY TO YOUR REGISTERED POST ID DATED JUL 2013 FOR REPRESENTATION AGAINST DISCONNECTED CA NO 6007XXXX -1.
DEAR SIR PLS NOTE MY REPLY IS BELOW
1.PLS NOTE CA NO 6007XXXXX1 IS NOT BELONGS TO ME IT IS BELONGS TO MR.XYZ K.NO 322XXXXX DDA FLAT NO XXX DELHI , PRESENTLY OWN BY 3RD OWNER.
2. PLS PROVIDE ME YOUR TEAM SITE REPORT TO STATING THAT MY LIVE CONNECTION 600XXXXXXX -2 IN MY NAME IS FEEDING SUPPLY WITH ALONG OTHER CONNECTION AT THIS SITE WITH PROOF OF PHOTO OF SITE.
3. PLS SEND YOUR VIGILANCE TEAM IN MY PRESENCE .
4. ALSO NOTE IF YOU WILL NOT TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION AS PER MY BELOW MAIL AND REPLY OF THIS NOTICE I WILL TAKE UP FURTHER THIS MATTER WITH YOUR LOK ADA LAT AND CONSUMER COURT TO SENDING ME WRONG NOTICE WITHOUT ANY SUPPORTING PROOF.
5. I AM ALREADY REPLY YOUR ALL QUERY IN BELOW MAIL.
NOTE: CONSIDER THIS REPLY TO YOUR REGISTERED POST.
.
SUB : REPLY OF YOUR NOTICE UNDER REGULATION 49(II) OF DERC SUPPLY CODE AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REGULATIONS, 2007
REF : NOTICE UNDER REGULATION 49(II) OF DERC SUPPLY CODE AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REGULATIONS, 2007 DATED 07.06.2013
Dear Sir
Ref to above mention sub and ref we have received this notice as on Jun 2013 by speed post. Pls note as per your notice TATA Power surveillance team carried out inspection of my premises with the view to ascertain the status of disconnected elec connection as mention below:
CA NO NAME ADDRESS DUES
6000XXXXXXX XYZ. XXX HOUSE E NO DELHI 32,010.00
Pls note this connection was allotted to XXX FLAT OWNER in year 1982 for the Elect supply of stair case of his House No XXX Delhi along with elect connection K.NO 322XXXXXXX.for HIS House NO XXX Flats Delhi
And also note there is no premises as NO A-Z Flat Delhi, as per allotment of DDA. So Above mention address is also wrong as per DDA allotment it should be Block H, House No.XXX City Delhi since this connection was allotted to MR.XYZ owner of House No XXX.
Pls no surveillance team has visited our premises and even they have not contact any family member during inspection neither hand over any notice or inspection report copy to us where we were present at our premises as on 6th Jun 2013. So this information provided to you is wrong and base less.
As per notice you have mention that against CA No 600YYYYY -2 in the name of ABC feeding supply of the aforesaid disconnected connection which is wrong and base less since this connection was for the supply to House No 5 stare case.
And more ever stair case light fitting was not working from last 20 years and already removed from stair case 20 years back by owner of House No XXX. And presently no elect fitting present from last 20 year in stair case attach with this connection C NO.6000XXXX - 1
Pls note we have not feeding supply of aforesaid disconnected connection or not supply through any unauthorized extension to this disconnected connection’s premises.
So we are here by requesting you windrow your this notice since we are not libel to pay this outstanding and we have not feeded any supply of this connection and also provide us inspection report.
Awaiting Your Early Reply.
DEAR EXPERT
MY QUERY IS AFTER SENDING ABOVE REPLY OF THEIR NOTICE STILL THAY ARE NOT AGREEING ON OUR REPLY AND DEMINDING TO PAY THE DUS PLS LEGAL ADVISE ON THE SAME TO SETTEL DOWEN THEIR NOTICE.ADVISE LE
Thanks And Regds
Setu Niket
(Expert) 17 July 2013
File a consumer complaint in District Consumer Forum.
