perjury in d.v. act by wife
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 14 April 2011
This query is : Resolved
respt sir/madam,
1)recently in d.v. case for maint. filed by my wife the jmfc has ordered some amount as interim relief. against this i filed a stay appeal but on the contrary wife also filed to increase in interim relief with the same false repeated allegations against husband and in laws.
2)here d j cancelled the appeal of husband and upheld the appeal of wife with order double the interim relief passed by jmfc.
however in both the places the court didnt called for domestic incidence report.
3)now i have decided to appeal in the high court with following points please help valuable suggestions to larger public interest-
-a)prayer to high court to order the trial court to use the power of crpc 310 to visit the place to find out the truth.
-b)to order trial court to take the cognizance against the wife and her parents u/s 340 of crpc. as husband is willing to take the responsibility, to prove the false statement made by wife, by using the power of court to attend the place of husband residence as per sec 310 of crpc.
-c)to explain the meaning of interim relief into the larger public interest with the co-relation of provision of sec.12 of d.v. act which requires to call for domestic report before passing any order.
-d)a contempt of court petition on the basis of false allegation and fraudulence action taken by wife to put the court in motion with false papers on oath.
please help me how to draft a hight court appeal that attempt will not result into dis-faith in the judiciary and the high court may not take some wrong presumption over smartness of husband or his counsel for the appeal to visit the place of crime alleged by wife but i am experiencing the same in this courty.
can make respondent both the judges i.e. jmfc and dj for their deliberate ignorance towards non calling of domestic valiance report even the husband has submitted the appeal in writing to call for such report
please tell me what kind of sections to be applied in appeal to high court in this regard.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 27 August 2015
dear i have same experience where judges does nothing and 100% false affidivit of wife has been treated as truth, for this i did every effort to give complaint against judge but not a single lawyer agreed to take the issue even ipc clearly says as under:-
Section 119 in The Indian Penal Code
119 Public servant concealing design to commit offence which it is his duty to prevent. —Whoever, being a public servant, intendÂing to facilitate or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of an offence which it is his duty as such public servant to prevent; 71 [voluntarily conceals by any act or omission or by the use of encryption or any other information hiding tool, the existence of a design] to commit such offence, or makes any represenÂtation which he knows to be false respecting such design; If offence be committed. —shall, if the offence be committed, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence, for a term which may extend to one-half of the longest term of such imprisonment, or with such fine as is provided for that offence, or with both; If offence be punishable with death, etc. —or, if the offence be punishable with death or 72 [imprisonment for life], with imprisonÂment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years; If offence be not committed. —or if the offence be not committed, shall be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence for a term which may extend to one-fourth part of the longest term of such imprisonment or with such fine as is provided for the offence, or with both. Illustration A, an officer of police, being legally bound to give information of all designs to commit robbery which may come to his knowledge, and knowing that B designs to commit robbery, omits to give such information, with intent to facilitate the commission of that offence. Here A has by an illegal omission concealed the existÂence of B's design, and is liable to punishment according to the provision of this section.
my experience is to go to public death against judges act and finish ownself in the open court who are not given respect to constitutional right of husband and judges are abusing the rights vested into them for public.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 27 August 2015
oksir., what ever may be., but whats your problem to show your identification..
or simple, you can do personal message to any body include me.
