reg IA clarification - reg

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 07 July 2010 This query is : Resolved
The Respondent had filed a IA for restoration of power in the residence.
The respondent had not paid the power bill hence power was cutoff.

The allegation is I had cut off the supply with out any reason.

In the pend ency of the previous IA (not disposed) the respondent had filed the present IA alleging the same.

In the IA he stated he is filing relevant supporting docs as proof but has not filed.

In notice it was endorsed by counsel that supporting docs in the present IA are not filed and received by the petitioners.

Now the counsel of respondent says that he is not filing any docs after filing the IA.

Is the IA admissible at the first place when he is not filing any supporting docs as claimed in the IA.

Should the court take cognizance of the frivolous claim of the respondent.

I have to file counter in 2 days.

Pl advice.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 07 July 2010
The IA does not seem to be maintainable and at the time of hearing you should not face much difficulty to get it rejected.