LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

regarding the form 22 of tractor for registration

Guest (Querist) 13 March 2011 This query is : Open 
Dear all Experts i need your help

That my father take the loan of a tractor from the state bank of India for a tractor.
2. That the agency of tractor played a fraud in the manner that they made 3 different sale bills of the tractor and all the three were different from each others. they submitted one bill with the bank which was of Rs 2,26,000/- and the same money was paid to them directly by the bank. the another bill was given to my father which was of Rs 1,89,000/- and which was bearing the signatures of my father. 3
on the same day they purchased the stamp paper in the name of my father and taken the signatures of my father on the blank stamp paper and after two day they disclosed in the stamp paper that the tractor was sold to some one Baje singh whose father name and address no mentioned in the affidavit of my father as the affidavit with its contents show that the signature were obtained on blank.
not over this when the tractor was sold the bank demanded the registration certificate of the tractor. now they played a fraud at this stage also that a from no 22 is supplied by the manufacturer of the vehicle but the form no 22 which was attached with the registration file was not issued by the manufacturer and the same has been declared as duplicate and not issued by them. the affidavit in this support for registration also does not bear the original signatures of my father. then the registration clerk in collusion with the accuse person made this registration certificate and the same is deposited in the bank for further proceedings.
4. That tis whole matter is of year 1998 and now my father also passed away in year 1999. various application were moved to the authorities in this regard and also for the cancellation of the registration certificate of the tractor.

5.now a FIR was registered in the Police Station of Bhuna Distt Fatehabad U/S 420,467,468,471 of IPC against 4 accused persons and the SHO of Police Station Bhuna is the investigation officer in the above said FIR.
6.That in this regard an investigation was done by DSP Tohana and also by the above said SHO, (prior the lodging of the FIR) and the report was also submitted by the DSP in this regard in which it was mentioned that the alleged form 22 was found fictitious and in this regard opinion of District Attorney may kindly be taken.
7.That now after this an investigation was also conducted by the Superintendent of Police in this regard and also enquired from the manufacturing Company of the Tractor i.e. Eicher Tractors Limited, Faridabad and with the opinion of District attorney the above said FIR was registered.
8.That the above said SHO is now Investigation officer in the above said FIR and no one has been arrested till date in this case. Even no statement has been recorded in this regard of the complainant by the investigation officer.
9. it is also pertinent to mention here that the loan was sanctioned in 2 days only at that time the litigation was pending between my father and us for the permanent injunction and for declaration and the same was compromised between us that my father will not alienate the suit land and at this stage the bank sanctioned the loan.


please guide me what i have to do now as no one has been arrested in this case and my appeal for suit for recovery which was filed by the bank for the recovery of the money as we lost the case in the civil court as well as in the district court the decision favouring the bank was given by the civiil court and the district court.



You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :