regrding the section 135 of police act

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 13 June 2010 This query is : Resolved
helllo all learned
in the case of 135 of the complaiant police written in his fir that the knife has been recovered from the pant of the accused while in the panchname the recovery done from the hero honda motor cycle that both are contradictory in the police papers what should do to prove it

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Arvind Singh Chauhan (Expert) 14 June 2010
let witness of panchnama depose on otah in court that recovery was done from motor cycle. Then put the contradiction before curt. if the police tries to correct this mistake in evidence, cross examine skillfully the witnesses.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 14 June 2010
Take the benefir while arguing the case or during the cross-examination of witnesses.

Guna Shekaran R (Expert) 14 June 2010
If you happened to be a victim in the FIR, then immediately contract the Public Prosecutor and highlight this point. Generally our police try to weaken the cases like this only help the Accused to get benefit of doubt. After that blames the Judges and Judiciary on the whole like in case of Bhopal Gas tragedy case.

Uma parameswaran (Expert) 15 June 2010
For accused it is benefit but for victim needs to more cautious in conducting the case.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries