Rental property dispute
hitesh daswani
(Querist) 16 October 2016
This query is : Resolved
If judgement of district court is with property owner , can tenant apply to the high court or he has to vacant the property immediately or he will ask to district court that he will not vacant the property as he has to apply to high court # what if fraud case is running in the same court against tenant (in the same rental property dispute case on the grounds of forged documents submitted to the court) can he still apply to high court?
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 16 October 2016
No need to vacate immediately.
Tenant may file appeal against the decision and get stay from execution.
hitesh daswani
(Querist) 16 October 2016
what if fraud case is running in the same court against tenant (in the same rental property dispute case on the grounds of forged documents submitted to the court) can he still apply to high court?
Guest
(Expert) 17 October 2016
If fraud is running in your case, as per your perception, you may seek help of the CBI.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 17 October 2016
Appeal is to be filed against the decision and documents on file. No new document / evidenc in general. Question on validity of any document / witness was to be raised during trial. If there is concrete proof of the fraud, include the point in appeal, to be decided on merit.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 18 October 2016
Two different queries/questions have been clubbed i.e., to file appeal against the eviction order passed by Court and another case of commitment of fraud against the tenant, highly complicated query/question.
Be clear in your mind what exactly you want to ask/examine/seek expert's opinion/advise?
Guest
(Expert) 18 October 2016
Mr. Hitesh Daswani,
From the description of your query that clearly reveals you are asking some hypothetical question that does not pertain to any real problem.
By the way, what is the relevance of "IFs" in your statements (1) "If judgement of district court is with property owner," AND "if fraud case is running" if there is some real problem?
Why don't you come with clear facts. Where is the question of your presumptions in case of any problem?
Moreover, how you have been able to judge that fraud case is running in the court?
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 18 October 2016
It seems that the subsequent part of the query has been modified / new facts question has been inserted by withdrawing previous.
What was the need of doing so?
Fraud case is separate, it can not snatch the right to go in appeal.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 19 October 2016
Pure academic hypothetical query. No reply.
