LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Reply on application

(Querist) 05 January 2012 This query is : Resolved 
sir,

in my matter under NI Act, one accused no.2 is absconded and one accused no. 3 advocate present for proceeding the matter,, examination-of-chief field long date before, application for attachement of property of absconder accused is pending, complainant trying to find out the detail of property. now the advocate for accused no. 3 has filed the application for tried separately or kept the said matter on dormant file.

I want to file my say on said application. what ground shall I object the said application ?
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 05 January 2012
You can say that your defence shall be disclosed if the accused no. 3 is tried separately and its benefit shall go in favour of all other accused persons. You can also reply that cause of action is same and moreover original documents are one and same so no separate trial can be made so the application should be demanded to be dismissed in the larger interest of justice.
ajay sethi (Expert) 05 January 2012
agree with maakad
prabhakar singh (Expert) 06 January 2012
agree with Mr.raj kumar makkad
Deepak Nair (Expert) 06 January 2012
I too agree with Mr.Rajkumar.
Shonee Kapoor (Expert) 06 January 2012
Nothing more needs to be added.

Regards,

Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :