BHARTI KOTHARI
(Querist) 05 February 2018
This query is : Resolved
Sir, theft of gold ornaments has occured at the place of Mr. A and accordingly Mr. B was arrested for offence of theft and at his instance gold was recovered from Mr.C who has been charged with receiver of stolen article. The recovery was made from jwellery shop of Mr. D, who is not involved in the crime either under 379/411 of crpc. infact when recovery was made police has shown shop belongs to Mr.C. that after Mr. D and original complainants Mr. A 's Father filled two cross apln for return of property. Mr. A's Father has no authority to make apln from Mr.A. MR. D in his APLICATION HAS ANNEXED ALL purchase bills, stock register, document showing that shop premises belongs to him and not Mr. C etc. Now Complainant has not produced single document like purchase bill of gold stolen from him. unfortunately court has allowed apln of Mr. A. One more point the desription of gold in complaint is different from gold recovered from Mr. D premises, all are new gold ornament to be kept in show case of shop. there desription are 33 ear rings, 67 chain, 3 bracelte, 44 jeants ring. Please advice me
Guest
(Expert) 05 February 2018
There is no doubt that few Black sheep in police dept join hands with criminals/thieves arrested by them to exploit and grab from innocent Jewellery shop owners.in the name of recovery.Discuss with local good criminal side advocate in detail.
Guest
(Expert) 05 February 2018
On feb 5th 2017 the Jewellers at Saraf Bazaar in Kalaburagi had conducted a protest against police condemning the arrest of innocent gold merchants falsely basing on such reasons
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 07 February 2018
How you are concerned with this academic and hypothetical question paper?
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup