LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Rights on grandmother property

(Querist) 19 September 2013 This query is : Resolved 
Respected sir, My grandfather was purchased 1.5 site on his name. When he was marring second time(i,e.,his second marriage with my grandmother's sister) he wrote that property to my grandmother name.Now he is not there, my grandmother have 3 sons.she gave half site to her 1st son and one full site to her 3rd son.Second son is my father but he was expired when i was 11 year old.I was questioned about that land allotment but she said that i have given site to your father but he sold out.The actual thing is she dint registered any property to my mother or my father name. She is telling that i sold it in my name only and i have given that money to your father.But its all fake.Now her 3rd son constructing a big shop in that site .Can i go and oppose that or is i have a rights to stop the construction.And one more thing still that property is in the name of my grand mother name only, but it came from my grandfather(he is also not there).sir, please help me and suggest me a favor sir because they cheated us everywhere .pleas suggset me sir...
ajay sethi (Expert) 19 September 2013
your grandmother is absolute owner of property as she inherited it from her husband by will . she can dispose it as she pleases .
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 19 September 2013
Well advised by the experts, nothing more to add.
R.K Nanda (Expert) 19 October 2013
agree with sethi.
prabhakar singh (Expert) 19 October 2013
Do not get touted to ruin your purse.

Property came in hands of your grand mother
from her husband(your grandfather)would be treated to be her EXCLUSIVE ONE and she can give it to any one even to one not from her family.
prabhakar singh (Expert) 20 October 2013
Rule 36, Section IV of the BCI rules prohibits the legal fraternity from advertising their services.
prabhakar singh (Expert) 20 October 2013
“36. An advocate shall not solicit work or advertise, either directly or indirectly, whether by circulars, advertisements, touts, personal communications, interviews not warranted by personal relations, furnishing or inspiring newspaper comments or producing his photographs to be published in connection with cases in which he has been engaged or concerned. His sign-board or name-plate should be of a reasonable size. The sign-board or name-plate or stationery should not indicate that he is or has been President or Member of a Bar Council or of any Association or that he has been associated with any person or organisation or with any particular cause or matter or that he specialises in any particular type of worker or that he has been a Judge or an Advocate General.”

Guest (Expert) 22 October 2013
Mr. Rajkumar,

You may be expert in SEBI matters, but probably you forget that the present problem of the querist is not a SEBI related problem or that which could be solved under the provisions of the Securities Contract Regulation Act. The matter is regulated under the provisions of relevant laws pertaining to succession/inheritance and transfer of properties. So, it would have been better had you guided the querist in accorance with the relevant property laws, rather than raising dispute with Shri Prabhakar Singh ji.

Had you been so curious to guide the querist on your own lines privately, you could well have advised him through Private messageing (PM) rather than asking him openly to contact you on phone or email in a very open manner.
Guest (Expert) 22 October 2013
Prabhakar ji,

From his profie page, Mr. N. Rajkumar does not seem to be an advocate. So, there seems to be nothing wrong if he advertises directly or indirectly about himself. However, instead of openly inviting the querist to contact him through Mobile or email, he could well have sent his private message through PM Box available at his own profile page.
prabhakar singh (Expert) 23 October 2013
Dhingra Ji!

If he is not an Advocate then you are right
he is not bound by BCI rules.

But the point is that he should have said so but you see he is still claiming to be what he is practically not.


He is waging war with one who does not speak for him and simultaneously looking for votes in his favor.I did not name him yet he took it for him.

People with rich experiences and thoughts have rightly said:

They whose guilt within their bosom lies, imagine every eye beholds their blame. Shakespeare


Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind. William Shakespeare


I regard that man as lost, who has lost his sense of shame. Plautus


Nothing is more wretched than a guilty conscience. Plautus


Guilt has very quick ears to an accusation. Henry Fielding


The guilty think all talk is of themselves. Chaucer
Guest (Expert) 24 October 2013
Mr. Rajkumar,

Of course, great fighting spirit!

In response to your latest post, you may or may not respond to any of the replies here, but since you have tried to cast aspersions on the members on this very page, the replies to your controversial remarks become due to be given only on this page in response to your posts, but not on any other unrelated page, which you might have created just to save your skin by diverting attention from the controversies raised by you only. Further, at least I am not obliged to be commanded by you to go to some other page to give reply to your controversial remarks of this page at some other page. So, my reply is posted here only. It is not a question of treating you as hiding, but certainly you are trying to hide yourself by asking me and Shri Prabhakar Singh to post replies to your remarks on some unrelated page.

About your earlier reply, I have no concern whether you are an advocate, a negotiator, a prime minister, a stock trader or broker, an investor, an ordinary clerk, or what else you are. However, if you are unable to take good advice of Shri Prabhakar Singh in right spirit, as as he tried to bring to your notice the provisions of BCI Rules, as a code of conduct for advocates, then your misunderstanding in itself definitely establishes that you are not an advocate. You have also taken my reply to Shri Prabhakar Singh in a very wrong spirit, where I stated, "there seems to be nothing wrong if he advertises directly or indirectly about himself," being not an advocate. You just came forward to fight against me, stating, "If people like you think I am canvassing for my business I don't care." I have never stated that you cannot canvass your business. Rather my statement was in your own favour. HOWEVER, I WONDER, HOW YOU PROPOSE TO SORT OUT THE PROBLEM OF THE QUERIST, WHEN YOU CANNOT EVEN INTERPRET ANYTHING CORRECTLY!

Secondly, if as per your profile, you claim to be a negotiator, fighting can never be a characteristic of a good negotiator. But your uncalled for fighting characteristics establishes that you can also not be a negotiator. Negotiators should always be humble by nature to be able to negotiate any favourable and beneficial deal. Needless to emphasize, favourable deals cannot be achieved through fighting.

Finally, about your remarks, "HOLY ANGELS Go and sit under tree and find the persons who need your comments," if you treat us holy angel, you should know that you are treating just opposite to us, which can be "unholy devil." But I won't say so. It is left only up to you to think and inform us, as to what you are, i.e., a holy angel or an unholy devil?

I wish, you are able to achieve some beneficial deal for the querist through your negotiating skills, instead of legal process. Good luck!
Guest (Expert) 24 October 2013
Prabhakar ji,

Thanks for your response to my earlier post. I have expressed my views above. For me, he is neither an advocate, nor a negotiator, as per his characteristics he revealed through his posts on this very page.

However, what is your opinion about him as against being a holy angel, as he considers us as holy angels?
prabhakar singh (Expert) 24 October 2013
Dhingra ji !
Here he calls ' holy angels' and there he calls 'nightmare'

Sufficient responses has gone to him.

I think we should retire from him so that we can do what we use to do here whenever we feel free.
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 24 October 2013
Prabhakar singh G! cool down. Is umar main itna ussa bhi achha nhi rehta.
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 24 October 2013
Laton ke bhoot baton se nhi mante, yeh bhi theek hai magar apne ko to site aur apni geema bnaye rakhni hogi g.
prabhakar singh (Expert) 24 October 2013
I AM VERY VERY SORRY MAKKAD JI AND BEG YOUR PARDON!
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 24 October 2013
Parbhakar Singh G! aap mujh sharminda kar rhe hain. Aise botruwo ka ilaj to aise hi hota hai magar fir bhi thod maryaditt dhang se pratikriya di jaye to aur bhi bdhiya rehta hai.

Mera to ek sujhav hai. aisa koi adiyal band aa jaye to bjaye usi expert ke reply kane ke, usko muh tod jwab anye experts dain. isse anwashyak ktuta bhi nhi aayegi aur baat bhi ban jayegi.

matlab milke ldayee ki jaye.
Guest (Expert) 25 October 2013
Prabhakar ji,

You can find, in spite of his vow, "your further comments in this column would be ignored by me," he had to respond to our observation. But, he could restrict only up to chanting of a children poem of "Jack & Jill" when he was unable to justify his standing.

Anyway, he has sufficiently exposed himself through his own writings about what type of expertise he possess.
Guest (Expert) 25 October 2013
Just see, how you are compelled to respond again & again. I knew, you would not be able to resist.

Anyway, but here only you are behaving like a joker, not me, Mr. Rajkumar. You are proving yourelf as a laughing stock for amusement of others.

About understanding of a children poem, probably, you think what is difficult for you to understand that may also be difficult for the whole of the world to understand. When you have not been able to understand about the conditions for advocates, which Shri Prabhakar pointed out to you, what else you can understand.

But, we have understood, what you are and what you pose to be. Just continue to recide children poems. Good luck!
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
Just see, how you are compelled to respond again & again. I knew, you would not be able to resist.

Anyway, but here only you are behaving like a joker, not me, Mr. Rajkumar. You are proving yourelf as a laughing stock for amusement of others.

About understanding of a children poem, probably, you think what is difficult for you to understand that may also be difficult for the whole of the world to understand. When you have not been able to understand about the conditions for advocates, which Shri Prabhakar pointed out to you, what else you can understand.

But, we have understood, what you are and what you pose to be. Just continue to recide children poems. Good luck!
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
Mr. Rajkumar,

Here the question is not judging people, but you, whom I have already judged.

Just keep up exposing you more & more, so that the people here may judge you adequately well about the circus lion coming out of the cage to amuse them.
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
Just see the circus lion jack has again been compelled to respond. Keep it up.
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
For knowing the meaning of the poem you need to take admission in a nursery school and to take proper treatment of your brain you need to consult a good psychiatrist, Mr. circus lion.
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
Dear kid,

Good, You are leaving today. Probably, you are going to attend your K.G. School to learn more children rhymes, as you have recently recited a poem of "Pussy Cat Pussy Cat." By now you have well proved that you are merely a student of some K.G. school and learning children rhymes and you have found this place to recite your poems learnt on day-to-day basis.

You can, continue to recite all the children poems one by one every day to amuse us all.

Good show, of course!
ajay sethi (Expert) 26 October 2013
Mr rajkumar

you are requested to kindly close the chapter .
Mr prabhakar singhji and MR Dhingraji are seasoned experts of LCI

we should not cast any aspersions on seniors .

we are here only to advise querits to best of our ability . we may disagree on answers but we should not indulge in any mud slinging act .

Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
So, dear pussy kid, you were hiding only, not going to your KG School and has come out again. Very bad on your part dear pussy kid! Now, how will you recite today's poem here, if you don't go to your KG school to learn more rhymes?

However, thanks for revealing your real identity of being a pussy cat. Otherwise, I was under wrong impression, as if you were a circus lion!

BUT, ONE THING IS CERTAIN that the pussy, in spite of her promise not to respond, has time and again been compelled to break her promise to respond. Do come again after learning today's rhyme of kids, dear pussy, and expose more and more of yourself.
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
So, the pussy has again appeared! Good! I was minding my own business, but every time you invited me through your crazy posts. Needless to mention, only you will have to take with you your own mud, which none else except you spread. You should not expect others to take that. It was you, who started casting aspersions.
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
I don't need counselling from a person who himself has the dire need to consult a psychiatrist.
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
Pussy cat, pussy cat, how many times do you propose to appear every day by posing as a self styled lion?

But, I know, you would definitely get horrified the whole night by remembering why you started the debate. Contrarily, I shall enjoy a very sound sleep.
Guest (Expert) 26 October 2013
Amused again! You have become a great source of my enjoyment! Let me know about your experience after you get treatment in the mental asylum.
V R SHROFF (Expert) 27 October 2013
"Property is her EXCLUSIVE "
So I support views of Shri P Singh & Shri Sethi.

All of you Experts: Please do not throw mud on shining image of LCI. We Experts are developing Prestigious image and respectable Screen of LCI for years.

Please, do not try not a hint of Advertisement.
If Querist wish, he / she will contact thru PM, E Mail or phone.

We need not invite or BEG for Clients: NEVER..

WE MUST ONLY REPLY HIS QUERY.
And NEVER:: NEVER COMMENT ON COLLEAGUE EXPERT.

BROTHERHOOD OF ADVOCATES, & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS MUST PREVAIL.

Please Discipline yourself in your own benefit and interest..
Remember, The whole world read it, for ever, at any time.in any corner of world.

And they judge you, and come to you after evaluating your Quality Reply.

Quantity of reply just to get point is useless, and Public is smart enough to select or reject you.

Further, the above incidence spoil image of LCI , as well as that of we Experts.
So please be disciplined, be careful, you are watched by millions, Pl set example.
Never repeat what I read above.
Regards,
With Love to all Experts and LCI,
...Your selected Captain of LCI Top Experts
Adv Shroff. 27-10-2013
V R SHROFF (Expert) 27 October 2013
MR. N RAJKUMAR;

I DID NOT ADDRESS ANYTHING TO YOU.
I did not post anything to you , nor commented
However you wrote to me . " Who the hell are you to say all this I say Do you think You are Guru for every one Absolutely not for me "

What did u find in my statement against you that u wrote on public platform

Unwanted elements has to be weeded out..

One has to control any damaging factor..."
how your comments will help the Querist??
I cannot spare time to read all that went ahead, but found it undesirable, and appealed all to behave properly.

But as you are going out of your limit,so

I HEREBY ASK LCI ADM TO DELETE YOUR NAME FROM LCI MEMBERSHIP, FOR YOUR MISBEHAVIOUR ON PUBLIC PLATFORM.



You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :