Sale agreement made between owner of the shop and the tenant to purchase, reg.,1.

ethirajulu (Querist) 15 July 2015 This query is : Resolved
1. A is the owner of the Shop.
2. B is the tenant of the "A".
3. A offered to sell his shop to B.
4. B agreed to purchase the shop from A.
5. A and B made an Agreement of sale 3-8-1989 and paid 50% of the sale consideration to the owner by cash.
6. A expired in the year 1991.
7. A' s wife sent a notice to the tenant to v vacate the shop for their own use on 20-2-1993.
8. B approached A's wife & shown her husband letter & agreement of sale. She agreed and received the balance amount by cash & also agreed to make a sale deed after getting Income- tax cleara
nce
9. A's wife sent a letter to the tenant stating that the said shop sold to another party.
10.In 1995 the purchasers sent a legal notice to rhe tenant to pay the arrears of rent.
11.The tenant replied suitably stating that paid full sale consideration waiting for Registration.
12.a. During the pendency of OS in civil court the purchaser filed HRC case against b (tenant)to vacate the shop, it has been dismissed.Further another HRC case is failed against the tenant(first agreement holder)which has been ex-party and evicted from the shop.
13.In 1996 a suit is filed in the Civil court and prayed as follows:-
a.a declaration that she is the owner of the suit property under Annexture E & F.
b. that the sale in favour of defendants 9& 10 is illegal and not binding on the plaintiffs and
c.for a direction to defendants 1 to 8 to execute and register the sale deed in respect of the suit property in favour of the plaintiff and consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants and all other persons claiming through or under them from interfering in any manner with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the schedule property and for costs of the suit in the interest of justice.
13.On 8-9-2003, the court gave a Judgement and Decree in favour of the plaintiffs as follows;-
The defendants 1 to 8 are hereby directed to execute and register the sale deed in favour of the plantiffs in respect of the suit scheduled property within a period of 3 months from the date of this order.If the defendents fails to execute and register the sale deed, the plantiffs are at liberty to execute the sale deed through the process of law.
14. In the year 2005 an execution is filed and got the judgement on 31-8-2009. The judge dismissed the execution petition.
15.A writ petition is filed in 2009 and the judge in 2010 adviced the petitioner to withdraw and file a RFA and if it is failed your at liberty for revival of writ petition.
16.The HC has dismissed the RFA due to delay.
17. Again the WP filed an application for revival and it is restored and the judge gave a judgement as rejected.

Kindly, give me the solution.

Follow Query

Report Abuse