Sc st act
james
(Querist) 04 October 2016
This query is : Resolved
SC/ST Case--Case registered by SI of Police--First stage of investigation by CI of police including arrest of the accused-- then investigation by Dysp - finally by ASP(tainee) and filed charge.
1)Is it proper and accordance with SC/ST act and Rules.
2)As per rule 7 investigating officer to appointed by Govt or DGP/SP.Whether an appointment order is required.
3)whether a blanket order appointing all DYSP is sufficient? Rule specifies qualification for appointment
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 04 October 2016
are you really facing a problem or setting question paper for students.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 05 October 2016
Academic query, state material facts of the problem if any.
james
(Querist) 05 October 2016
A REAL CASE BEFORE SPECIAL COURT. CHARGE U/S 3(2)( V) SC ST ACT AND 376 IPC
james
(Querist) 05 October 2016
Victim is a lady belongs to SC community,married having 2 children but deserted by husband.Accused is a driver belong to OBC.The allegation is that he while traveling in tempo he committed rape in the drivers cabin on 7-7-10 and two or three occasions sexual intercourse at her/his residence. She never disclosed her earlier marriage.On 28-11-12 a customary marriage was conducted at his residence.One her relatives found her with accused and then all the truth comes out.She left him and filed above complaint.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 06 October 2016
Full case file has to be referred, discuss with local lawyer.
