sec.138 N.I.Act. filing of documents after examination of accused

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 23 March 2011 This query is : Resolved
Trial is not commenced in the cheque bounce case under sec. 138 N.I. Act. The examination of the accused completed and posted for trial. The reply notice which is issued by the accused is misplaced wherein the transaction is admitted by the accused.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Ghanshyam Mishra (Expert) 24 March 2011
It will not be prejudicing you as you will have a liberty to put to comp. a suggestion regarding his admission.Defense taken by accused has to be proved by him .

indrajit mukhopadhyay (Expert) 24 March 2011
if reply notice is lost that does not matter,during trial you've got to prove your own cases.

Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 24 March 2011
If the accused had admitted the the legal notice, no problem.

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (Expert) 24 March 2011
There are so many other factors than notice. Admission of notice is not admission of guilt.

Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 24 March 2011
It is true that the admission of notice is not admission of guilt. But, now the notice is misplaced, so, the admission of notice will help the complainant to prove his case.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries