Sec 66-a of it act 2008
K K S V SOMESWAR
(Querist) 08 August 2013
This query is : Resolved
A criminal case was booked against an official u/s Sec.66-A of IT Act 2008. Charge sheet says, two fake email IDs were created and mails were sent to different destinations which are derogatory and defamatory against some persons. one of those persons made a complaint in Cyber crime police station. the mails were sent from internet cafes. no evidence or proof was recorded in internet cafes that the arrested official has created and sent those mails except confession cum seizure panchanama in police station which were witnessed by another two officials from the same company. basing on police case the company suspended the official. in the charge sheet submitted in the court, except 7 witness from company side, 4 witness from internet cafe and one police witness no other material evidence is there. can the case be quashed in high court ?? if the case is quashed he can gain his employment back by revoking the suspension ?
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 09 August 2013
Why to repeat the same query which already stands duly replied?
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 06 October 2013
You have repeated almost same facts on many threads:-
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/SEC-66-A-OF-IT-ACT-2008-414206.asp#.UlECoVPQyVE
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/DISCREPANCY-IN-PANCHANAMA--423246.asp#.UlECmlPQyVE
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/validity-of-document-423656.asp#.UlECmFPQyVE
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/department-enquiry-424161.asp#.UlECkVPQyVE
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/INTERNAL-ENQUIRY-427321.asp#.UlECjVPQyVE
by repeated query the facts are not going to change.
