Summon served again in the name of managing director in case of 125 of maitenance.
Sundram N
(Querist) 21 May 2013
This query is : Resolved
Dear Senior and Friends,
Kindly suggest that, husbnad is working in a organisation and the summon of the case is again served to the address of Director. Previously, the summon is sent to the address of director of the organisation but the same summon is backed to the court.
once again, the summon is sent to the name of director of the organisation for serving the summon to the husbnad employee. court said in this time to make aware to the employee through the director that the case is filed and to present otherwise ex party will be made.
kindly suggest that the court issued the summon to the director to serve the summon to the hand of husbnad employee , this will be deemed to serve the summon to the hand of husbnad through direcor. As previously, director submitted to the court that he is not any concerned to the case and summon is backed.
i am making strategy to back the summon as made previously stating that direcor is not concerned to the case therefore summon is making back.
kindly suggest.
Guest
(Expert) 21 May 2013
Being a student, it seems as if you have posted an academic query!
The question arises at first, in what capacity you are related to the case?
Secondly, whosoever be the party, why an employer is being tried to be made a party to a private case between the husband and wife?
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 21 May 2013
The court can very well direct the employer to ensure the service of its summons to its employee. There is no question of involving director in the private litigation by doing this process.
