Summon u/s 160 crpc

Naveen KG (Querist) 01 January 2018 This query is : Resolved
My sister received a summon this evening from Inspector of police guduvancherry police station chennai tamilnadu India. Stating that to present at the police station in the for enquiry on the summon u/s 160 crpc.
Does she has to present in police station or she shall directly go the court to check the enquiry.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Naveen KG (Querist) 02 January 2018
My sister received a summon this evening from Inspector of police guduvancherry police station chennai tamilnadu India. Stating that to present at the police station in the for enquiry on the summon u/s 160 crpc. Does she has to present in police station or she shall directly go the court to check the enquiry.

Ms.Usha Kapoor (Expert) 02 January 2018
She need not go to the police station as women and males less than 15 years in age are exempt from appearance in police station except in their residences as.per section 160 CR...P.C Proviso.

ramaraju ramaiah (Expert) 02 January 2018
summons issued by police U/s160 Crpc there are certen rules. ladies are are not call to police station after 6 PM and also affix the seal on the summons and it must be signed by the concerned officer. Fir no must be mentioned in the summons what type of enquiry make by the police should be written in the summons. if failed it is not necessry to go to police station and consult legal oipenion of the local lawyers

Hemant Agarwal (Expert) 02 January 2018
1. "IF" the sister DOES NOT reside within the jurisdiction of "guduvancherry police station" THEN the sister need not attend the Police Station.

2. The Sister can attend the Police station accompanied by her Lawyer.

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal

Guest (Expert) 02 January 2018
@ Ramaraju Ramaiah,

Vague & hasty reply for a vague academic query without knowing the background of the case or the contents of the summons !
Has the querist anywhere stated that his sister has been asked to attend the police station at on the same day and that too after 6.00 PM? time?

Also, your advice is wrong in so far you have stated "not necessary to go to police station," where section 160 has stated that she need not attend police station within time up to 6.00 PM?

Guest (Expert) 02 January 2018
Vague answers to vague academic query in the absence of background of the case or the contents of the summon. Has your sister been asked to attend the police station at some specific date and time?

Also, does your sister not reside within the jurisdiction of the inspector of police issuing summon?

Hemant Agarwal (Expert) 02 January 2018
Your lower Backside is giving out Hot Black Smoke.

Guest (Expert) 02 January 2018
@ Hemant Agarwal,

Pity ! How senselessly the querist has been insulted by your statement, "Your lower Backside is giving out Hot Black Smoke, as addressed on his query! He has asked a query, not given you the right to insult him, even if he has not posted the full facts. You could well have felt free to ask any info from him, but would not have addressed like that.

However, if the information pertains to yourself, thanks for revealing your health conditions with the said statement of your statement, "The lower Backside is giving out Hot Black Smoke." I can understand your apathy for your hurried response to the query without knowing even the complete background of the case.

But, wonder, what was the need for you to make the readers of this page to make them aware of your health conditions? You would have consulted some good doctor of your own locality. You could have attended your doctor first before attending to this query in a hurry.

Guest (Expert) 02 January 2018
Well Advised by Experts. Section 160 crpc refers to the calling of witnesses for enquiry.

Adv. Yogen Kakade (Expert) 02 January 2018
Before visiting the police station it is advisable to inquire about whether an FIR is registered against her at the police station. If yes, then the sections mentioned in the FIR are bailable of non bailable. Take a help of a good lawyer and prepare for bail.

Adv. Yogen Kakade
Jurycon Incorporation (Advocates & Consultants)
Email: juryconincorporation@gmail.com
Web: www.juryconn.in Phone: 020-65248888 / 09225510883

Sankaranarayanan (Expert) 02 January 2018
Need more clarity on your query. I do stand with Mr Jigyasu.

Guest (Expert) 02 January 2018
@ Shri Sankar Narayanan,

Thank you for standing with me by agreeing to my views.

Kumar Doab (Expert) 02 January 2018
You may ask the Police Official that; will he/she arrange to pay reasonable expenses.
If there are seasoned leaders of some woman organizations/forums/NGO’s keep them with you.

Kumar Doab (Expert) 02 January 2018
IT=@PSD
The entity at 7th,8th,10th post in this thread and also in other threads of same/other querists and from the day the query is initiated, and everyday in all threads from Day1 from all of IT’s=@PSD’s multiple fake ID’s have done NOHING else than
Littering IT’s=@PSD’s TRADEMARK TAMASHAA ( Die Hard Habit; IT’s own admission) , nuisance, abuse, sarcasm, quarrels, attacks, and affliction for vagueness……
IT’s=@PSD’s contribution in the threads of the querist and all threads is NIL and ZERO.
Advertising picture of a sick, old entity in one of multiple fake ID’s was/is/will not be of NO impact/effect/consequence…..
The daily TRADEMARK TAMASHAA is just to earn points and claim IT as qualification at other ONLINE portals outside LCI…….while indeed this is NO qualification at LCI or any other ONLINE portals…
While IT=@PSD unsuccessfully tries to pose as Jackal of all Trades and fails DAILY………..to know that IT does not know A,B,C, upto…………..Z of all trades….
IT=@PSD will convert A,B,C, upto…………..Z into Alph, be, te, pe,…..upto last alphabet….
http://www.lexilogos.com/keyboard/urdu.htm
Don’t get mislead by cheap tactics for publicity.

Kumar Doab (Expert) 02 January 2018
In all threads you initiated/will initiate with your ID have been/will be provided with meaningful inputs that you my take home and leave the Trademark nuisance/sarcasm/personal attacks/daily quarrel that is littered at LCI from Day1 by chronic and habitual offenders …………………………
And go back to elders of your family/competent and experienced well wishers ……………..senior LOCAL counsels of unshakable repute and integrity specializing in such matters and having a successful track record in such matters…………
Keep your LOCAL counsel by your side.

Your OWN senior LOCAL counsel as suggested above can draw strategy for you and render a considered opinion as per facts and details of your matter and render a considered opinion to you.
Finally you may decide on what exactly you would prefer to do as per merits or NO merits…….
IT shall be futile to litigate IF there are NO favorable points at the moment …….and until merits are built..
Your OWN senior LOCAL counsel as suggested above, worth his/her salt shall update you on recourses, options and merits in each option….

Your query is rightly suggested by Ms. Usha Kapoor, Shri. Ramaraju Ramaiah, Shri Heman Agarwal, Shri Kumar Doab, Shri Yogen Kakade………
And there is endorsement that you have been rightly advised by Experts.

Now as usual IT=@PSD will run to litter IT's=@PSD's trademark Tamashaa, nuisance,abuse, at profile of Querist, members,Experts, LCI Admin and start calling all Property Dealers, Terrorists...............

Guest (Expert) 02 January 2018
IT-@Kumar Doab

Welcome Mr. Kuamr Doab (unreal name of a fake expert) with demonstration of unsound mind. Pity, in spite of strict instructions of the psychiatrist for complete bed rest, Mr.Kumar Doab has to work over time for his masters just for a meager commission as their agent and tout. One of his master is already here with his vague contribution. Probably, he has been released by his master in his support.

However, he is also able to play number game just to add scores to his credit with his totally vague and irrelevant multiple posts, like he made 3 posts in reply to a single vague question but with no tangible advice to the querist.

P. Venu (Expert) 02 January 2018
The Police Officer is wrong in requiring your sister to attend the Police Station; this is a clear violation of proviso to Section 160:

160. Police Officer’s power to require attendance of witnesses.
(1) Any police officer making an investigation under this Chapter may, by order in writing, require the attendance before himself of any person being within the limits of his own or any adjoining station who, from the information given or otherwise, appears to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case; and such person shall attend as so required:

Provided that no male person under the age of fifteen years or above the age of sixty-five years or a woman or a mentally or physically disabled person shall be required to attend at any place other than the place in which such male person or woman resides.

(2) The State Government may, by rules made in this behalf, provide for the payment by the police officer of the reasonable expenses of every person, attending under sub-section (1) at any place other than his residence.

ramaraju ramaiah (Expert) 03 January 2018
@P.VENUS statement is correct and I agree with him

Guest (Expert) 03 January 2018
@ Mr. Ramaraju, Ramaiah,

I differ with your views. It is not the statement of Mr. P. Venu, but verbatim reproduction of the section 160. Apparently the querist desired guidance when he asked, whether "she has to present in police station or she shall directly go the court to check the enquiry," but not desired reproduction of the section. Seemingly, he wanted proper interpretation of the proviso below section 160.

Mere verbatim reproduction of section does not solve his problem.

Guest (Expert) 03 January 2018
@ Mr. Naveen KG,

I understand, your academic query revolves around the interpretation of the proviso below section 160. Why don't you clarify your position, what exactly is your problem, if that is real?
.

Hemant Agarwal (Expert) 03 January 2018
This fellow nick named "JIGYASU" claims himself as a "Legal Analyst".
For his various posts, it seems that he is here only to Criticise & Ridicule other expert participants.
This fellow nick named "JIGYASU" never provides any answers to any queriest and only keeps on twisting his perverted words. BEWARE OF HIM & HIS NEFARIOUS HABIT.

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal

Guest (Expert) 03 January 2018
@ Mr. Hemant Agarwal,

It seems exposure of fake experts has become indigestible to you. You should know that a person with appropriate knowledge only can criticize others' advice, if the so called experts are found to be wrong in their interpretation of law. Mind it, reproduction of sections cannot be called as an expertise. If you think Mr. P. Venu is correct in his advice, what you have to say about your own yesterday's advice, which is in contradiction to the advice of Mr. P. Venu.

IF YOU ARE REALLY AN EXPERT, YOU MUST CLARIFY THIS POINT. WHETHER YOUR ADVICE IS CORRECT OR MR. VENU'S ADVICE.

May or may not the author of the problem have a real problem, but certainly would get confused, as to which of the advice is correct, i.e., yours or Mr. Venu's advice.

NOT ON ACCOUNT OF ANY NEFARIOUS HABIT, BUT I POINT OUT JUST TO MAKE YOU PEOPLE REALIZE THAT YOU HAVE THE NEED TO REVISE AND UPDATE YOUR KNOWLEDGE. OF COURSE THAT IS IN YOUR OWN INTEREST & REPUTATION, NOT OF MINE.

IT IS ONLY WITH THE HALF BAKED KNOWLEDGE AND WRONG INTERPRETATION OF LAW OF THE LAWYERS THAT MAKE THEIR CLIENT GET INJUSTICE BY LOSING THEIR CASES.

Kumar Doab (Expert) 03 January 2018
The Querists, Members, Experts, LCI Admin and all readers……………everyone must note and remember permanently that the entity about whom Mr. Hemant Agarwal has also pointed out in his last post, has been keeping many nick names but is actually one of the multiple fake ID’s of IT=@PSD.........many of whom have been blocked/blacklisted/shunted out………..
The chronic, die had habit (IT’s=@PSD’s own admission) is to allure, fleece unsuspecting querists………at LCI and other online portals………
IT=@PSD claims at many other online portals that IT’s=@PSD’s Ordinary membership at LCI is some kind of extra ordinary qualification. WHILE IT IS NOT.
IT=@PSD poses as some Chief Lawyer ….. WHILE IT IS NOT.
IT=@PSD poses and advertises some unknown firms as some kind of LAW Firms ………… WHILE IT IS NOT.
IT=@PSD has also been claiming that MONEY once paid to IT cannot be claimed and taken back from IT.
From day 1 under this fake ID also… IT=@PSD has been littering IT’s=@PSD’s TRADEMARK TAMASHAA, NUISANCE,ABUSE,SARCASM, ..DAILY IN ALL THREADS …..while IT’s contribution is NIL and ZERO=0.
The afflictions posted I this thread is also NOTHING NEW.
IT has not spared a single querist, member, Expert, LCI ADMIN and IT=@PSD won’t stop.

P. Venu (Expert) 03 January 2018
Yes, I do agree. It is high time that we took a united stand against this self proclaimed Legal Analyst and JIGYASU who is hellbent to ensure that every querist and expert is ridiculed and LCI disgraced!

Guest (Expert) 03 January 2018
@ Kumar Doab,

See the fun, the tout/ agent of his master, Mr. Kumar Doab (unreal name & a fake expert), has also appeared with his unsound mind in support of his master. Mr. Kumar Doab with his unsound mind is welcome with his utter irritation and frustration.

Kumar Doab (Expert) 03 January 2018
IT=@PSD

and all of IT's multiple fake ID's,

Nothing new in IT's last post above my this post................

Verbatim IT is same as in IT's=@PSD's Trademark Tamashaa from Day1 under all of IT's multiple fake ID's................

IT=@PSD won't stop.

Guest (Expert) 03 January 2018
@ Mr. P. Venu,

Hope you would have read my post in response to the post of Mr. Hemant Agarwal.

In his advice, Mr. Hemant Agarwal has categorically said that the sister of the querist has to attend the police station, as is clear from his statement, ""IF" the sister DOES NOT reside within the jurisdiction of "guduvancherry police station" THEN the sister need not attend the Police Station.. The Sister CAN ATTEND the Police station accompanied by her Lawyer."

CONTRARILY, YOU HAVE STATED, "The Police Officer is wrong in requiring your sister to attend the Police Station; this is a clear violation of proviso to Section 160."

CAN YOU CLARIFY, WHETHER YOUR ADVICE IS CORRECT OR MR. HEMANT AGARWAL'S ADVICE IS CORRECT?

IF NOT, HOW YOU CAN TAKE A UNITED STAND WITH OTHER EXPERTS, WHEN YOUR OWN ADVICE DIFFERS WITH OTHERS?

Guest (Expert) 03 January 2018
@ Mr. Kumar Doab,

Welcome again Mr. Kumar Doab with your profusely irritated and frustrated unsound mind. Mr. Kumar Doab may feel free to continue with playing the number game with his irrelevant and vague posts just to soothe his unsound mind.

Summon u/s 160 crpc

Similar Resolved Queries :