Transfer of proceeding from one bech of high court to another on its own.
anil verma (registeronlyfree)
(Querist) 19 August 2011
This query is : Resolved
While attending the proceedings before high Court the cousel for the petitioner did not appar and his subordinate counsel took a plea that the main counsel is busy with arguments in other court.
However the Court oreder for Next call list objecting repeated adjournment sought by the employer.
To utmost surprise the ordr sheet appearing on net says for tne nomination of another bench and sent the case to Chief Justise for nomination of another bench.
It appears that the clerical staff below in connivance with each other has framed this device to benefit the petitioner company.
Previously also the staff had been copertaing the petioner company by not feeding the case.
The transfer will certainly effect both the parties as one party will stand fully gained while the other party will be carried away by miscarriage of justice as the STAY order obtained earlier on the ground stands finaly settled by the present Judge three years back by the present judge.
What is the effective remedy for me to challenge this issue before the honble Supreme Court ? will I get any proper relief?
Can an representation before the present Judge or before the Chief Justice will be proper and effective.
If the writ petition is heard by the present Judge its lawfully it stands decided in the favour of one party.
Pl suggest quick and effective remedy. As early as possible
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 19 August 2011
Very simple.. At the time of your next hearing just you mentioned before the current judge that your case should be heard by some other judge.. I mean pray to post before some other judge. Its will be considered.. Usually no need any formal petition for this..
