Typing negligence, how the court consider it ?

Guest (Querist) 20 August 2010 This query is : Resolved
In reply to my petition,the tenant declared himself an "OWNER" once and then a "TENANT" many times in ongoing paras,it is a typing mistake committed due to negligence as would be claimed by my opponenet.In our rejoinder,I have pointed out many times that he is trying to confuse the court by claiming to be OWNER and TENANT simultaneously-------How the Court would consider this "mistake" of my opponent ?

Or how the courts consider such "mistakes" generally ?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Y V Vishweshwar Rao (Expert) 20 August 2010
Generally -Any contradictory claims, even by Type mistakes, in the same petition or Counter can not be cosnidered by the Courts . The original stand of the party will be cosnidered. You have already filed rejoinder to the Counter /Reply adverting the msitakes commited by other party and his intention to confuse, these things can be submitted at the time of arguements and Court can take note of same for consideration.

Kiran Kumar (Expert) 20 August 2010
since u ve already pointed out the typographical errors there, if the other party is prudent enough then they will seek the necessary amendment under the relevant provisions of CPC.