What after examination of witness is done
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 28 August 2011
This query is : Resolved
dear sir,
i have filed a suit for possesssion in delhi high court which has been encroached upon by my younger brother.
the issues have been framed andd the cross exaination of witnesses of plaintiff, me is to take place on sep 20
the cross ex of witnesses of defenedents shall take place later.
i would like to know if
1. what happens next.?
2. does the court ask us to submit a final written statement before the final arguments take place?
3. can my lawyer submit fresh documents relevant to the quesries as he cross examines the witnesses of the defendents.?
4, is it our prerogative to submit fresh docs at witness cross examination time or does the discretion lie with the delhi high court?
thanks vinay kala
aug 28,11
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 28 August 2011
1. ARGUMENT
2.No
3.Yes
4.Yes can place for the comment of the witness. If he admits then the same gets admitted . If not then you may not get the opportunity to prove it unless the relevant provisions of the Evidence Act is complied with.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 29 August 2011
i agree with Expert : Devajyoti Barman
Guest
(Expert) 29 August 2011
I also agree with the Expert, Shri Devajyoti Barman.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 29 August 2011
thanks mr Barman,
your reply is so concise, so clear that i am truly benefited and grateful to you for your short complete reply.
thanks sir also for the prompt response which could not have been improved upon.
it is too good and clear
thanks again sir
vinay kala
aug 29,2011
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 29 August 2011
thanks mr Barman,
your reply is so concise, so clear that i am truly benefited and grateful to you for your short complete reply.
thanks sir also for the prompt response which could not have been improved upon.
it is too good and clear
thanks again sir
vinay kala
aug 29,2011
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 29 August 2011
dear barman sir,
while you have answered the query adequately a doubt remains which i would like to clarify.
1 the defendant claims that he constructed the floor in 1987-88 whereas the MCD HAS STATED IN THEIR WRITTEN STATEMENT ALREADY ON RECORD THAT THE SITE PLAN WAS SANCTIONED ON 23.2.88. SO IT IS OBVIOUS THAT HIS STATEMENT IS UNTRUE.
IN THE CROSS EXAMINATION OF THE DEFENDANTS
I WANT SOME DOCUMENTS OF THE MCD NOT ALREADY FILED TO BE SHOWN AS EVIDENCE THAT TILL JANAURY 1999 THE MCD RECORDS DID NOT SHOW ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE FLOOR WHERE HE SAYS CONSTRUCTION WAS DONE IN 87-88.
THE MCD IS OUR WITNESS AND BEFORE THE CROSS EXAMINATION OF THE DEFENDANTS THE MCD WOULD HAVE BEEN CALLED FOR ADMITTING DOCS ALREADY FILED.
WHAT ABOUT OTHER DOCS OF MCD WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN FILED BUT WHICH SHALL BE SHOWN TO DEFENDANT TO DISPROVE HIS WRONG STATEMENT?
I ASSUME THAT THE DOCS SHOULD BE ALLOWED AND AGAIN THE WITNESS , MCD WILL HAVE TO CALLED TO PROVE THE DOCS?
KINDLY ENLIGHTEN
VINAY KALA
AUG 29,11
IF
