Whether a fresh authorization is required for a particular case or a GPA mentioning all acts to do
Rajat sahotra
(Querist) 02 August 2011
This query is : Resolved
Only the authorized person is examined in CW's by complainant bank.Whether complaint is still maintainable?
no bank official is examined and evidence closed.
The old bank manager transferred who filed the complainant under sec 138 NI act.
New manager produced an POA for his authorization in which no where mentioned to authorize him for particular case.
Whether a fresh authorization is required for this particular case or a GPA mentioning all acts to do or not executed 3-4 years back is enough?
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 02 August 2011
Just see the case's short cause title sir, there complainant name will be as THE BRANCH MANAGER, REP BY so and so... As per your statements now the erstwhile branch manager transfered. Now the new manager can proceed further. How ever the representing agent only changed. The complainant renaming the same.
