LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

An message for all litigating husbands & wives

Page no : 2

(Guest)

Try to understand relations. no relation can work only because law does not allow it to break.

LOVE & Trust are the essence of any relationship. once both are lost no court in world or even GOD can make relation work. IRBM takes care of financial need of wife. wat else she needs if there is no love in relation. why shud she cry daily or get beaten by her husband or beat him or get abused or abuse him. let them live separately and if not happily at least peacefully and respectfully.

if u make tem live together by force they will keep fighting over karela and butter chiken. actually these karela and butter chiken are not the real issues. if there is no love these are ways to vent out frustation and make false issues to fight upon.

so prabhakar is right in saying karela and butter chicken as issues. these are planks/ploys to fight on a war.

IRBM after 3 years is too long it shud be 2 years rather. life and time both are precious. 

if wife is not financially independent / disabled / uneducated there is provision in IRBM for her to get financial security. so IRBM will be a boon for warring couples and partly for lawyers too as you will see a marginal rise in  divorce cases.

Read OSHO, nothing (relation) on earth can work without LOVE.


(Guest)

osho on love and relationship:

relationship destroys all the love.

i differ a liitle bit here  forced relationship certainly destroys love only hatred remains.

oshos interview:

BELOVED OSHO,
IS RELATIONSHIP THERE BECAUSE LOVE IS NOT?

yes. Love is not a relationship. Love relates, but it is not a relationship. A relationship is something finished. A relationship is a noun; the full stop has come, the honeymoon is over. Now there is no joy, no enthusiasm, now all is finished.
You can carry it on, just to keep your promises. You can carry it on because it is comfortable, convenient, cozy. You can carry it on because there is nothing else to do. You can carry it on because if you disrupt it, it is going to create much trouble for you.
Relationship means something complete, finished, closed. Love is never a relationship; love is relating. It is always a river, flowing, unending. Love knows no full stop; the honeymoon begins but never ends. It is not like a novel that starts at a certain point and ends at a certain point. It is an ongoing phenomenon. Lovers end, love continues. It is a continuum. It is a verb, not a noun. And why do we reduce the beauty of relating to relationship? Why are we in such a hurry? -- because to relate is insecure, and relationship is a security, relationship has a certainty. Relating is just a meeting of two strangers, maybe just an overnight stay and in the morning we say goodbye. Who knows what is going to happen tomorrow? And we are so afraid that we want to make it certain, we want to make it predictable. We would like tomorrow to be according to our ideas; we don't allow it freedom to have its own say. So we immediately reduce every verb to a noun.
You are in love with a woman or a man and immediately you start thinking of getting married. Make it a legal contract. Why? How does the law come into love? The law comes into love because love is not there. It is only a fantasy, and you know the fantasy will disappear. Before it disappears settle down, before it disappears do something so it becomes impossible to separate.
In a better world, with more meditative people, with a little more enlightenment spread over the earth, people will love, love immensely, but their love will remain a relating, not a relationship. And I am not saying that their love will be only momentary. There is every possibility their love may go deeper than your love, may have a higher quality of intimacy, may have something more of poetry and more of God in it. And there is every possibility their love may last longer than your so-called relationship ever lasts. But it will not be guaranteed by the law, by the court, by the policeman.
The guarantee will be inner. It will be a commitment from the heart, it will be a silent communion. If you enjoy being with somebody, you would like to enjoy it more and more. If you enjoy the intimacy, you would like to explore the intimacy more and more.
And there are a few flowers of love which bloom only after long intimacies. There are seasonal flowers too; within six weeks they are there in the sun, but within six weeks again they are gone forever. There are flowers which take years to come, and there are flowers which take many years to come. The longer it takes, the deeper it goes.
But it has to be a commitment from one heart to another heart. It has not even to be verbalized, because to verbalize it is to profane it. It has to be a silent commitment; eye to eye, heart to heart, being to being. It has to be understood, not said.
It is so ugly seeing people going to the church or the court to get married. It is so ugly, so inhuman. It simply shows they can't trust themselves, they trust the policeman more than they trust their own inner voice. It shows they can't trust their love, they trust the law.
Gandha, forget relationships and learn how to relate. Once you are in a relationship you start taking each other for granted. That's what destroys all love affairs. The woman thinks she knows the man, the man thinks he knows the woman. Nobody knows either. It is impossible to know the other, the other remains a mystery. And to take the other for granted is insulting, disrespectful.
To think that you know your wife is very very ungrateful. How can you know the woman? How can you know the man? They are processes, they are not things. The woman that you knew yesterday is not there today. So much water has gone down the Ganges; she is somebody else, totally different. Relate again, start again, don't take it for granted.
And the man that you slept with last night, look at his face again in the morning. He is no more the same person, so much has changed. So much, incalculably much, has changed. That is the difference between a thing and a person. The furniture in the room is the same, but the man and the woman, they are no more the same. Explore again, start again. That's what I mean by relating.
Relating means you are always starting, you are continuously trying to become acquainted. Again and again, you are introducing yourself to each other. You are trying to see the many facets of the other's personality. You are trying to penetrate deeper and deeper into his realm of inner feelings, into the deep recesses of his being. You are trying to unravel a mystery which cannot be unraveled.
That is the joy of love: the exploration of consciousness. And if you relate, and don't reduce it to a relationship, then the other will become a mirror to you. Exploring him, unawares you will be exploring yourself too. Getting deeper into the other, knowing his feelings, his thoughts, his deeper stirrings, you will be knowing your own deeper stirrings too. Lovers become mirrors to each other, and then love becomes a meditation. Relationship is ugly, relating is beautiful.
In relationship both persons become blind to each other. Just think, how long has it been since you saw your wife eye to eye? How long has it been since you looked at your husband? Maybe years. Who looks at one's own wife? You have already taken it for granted that you know her. What more is there to look at? You are more interested in strangers than in the people you know -- you know the whole topography of their bodies, you know how they respond, you know everything that has happened is going to happen again and again. It is a repetitive circle.
It is not so, it is not really so. Nothing ever repeats; everything is new every day. Just your eyes become old, your assumptions become old, your mirror gathers dust and you become incapable of reflecting the other.
Hence I say relate. By saying relate, I mean remain continuously on a honeymoon. Go on searching and seeking each other, finding new ways of loving each other, finding new ways of being with each other. And each person is such an infinite mystery, inexhaustible, unfathomable, that it is not possible that you can ever say, "I have known her," or, "I have known him." At the most you can say, "I have tried my best, but the mystery remains a mystery."
In fact the more you know, the more mysterious the other becomes. Then love is a constant adventure.

DR.SANAT KUMAR DASH (Eye Specialist)     24 September 2010

DABONG  LADY  JI,    MANY   THANKS................2    YOU       FOR   THE    NICE    DESCRIPTION.


(Guest)

Dabang Lady

thanks ,now everyone loves osho...

1 Like

Renuka Gupta ( Gender Researcher )     24 September 2010

I did not read that reply which commented on  gender researcher/s. some replies are pretty predictable and  as far as I am concerned, I  just ignore them. Now if it has been said that technical legal knowledge is a necessity to be a member of this forum I do not agree. I did not say I do not know laws, laws are interpreted and anlysed through gender lens, a gender researcher does analyse policies and laws alike. When I said I am a non legal person, I referred to a simple fact that I am not an advocate. Law making processes are interdisciplinary processes, and are essentially rooted in the historical forces or resistant to historical forces and social, cultural, political and religious contexts. So gender researchers have everything to do with this forum.

Dialogues needs to proceed on mutually respectful way to have some outcome. When dialogues degenerate into throwing challenges, one may or may not like to engage further and depending on so many factors may like to ignore such postings. 


(Guest)

there's a famous so called spiritual guru who was famous for his obsession with s*x.

in one case i heard that in his workshop he urged people to have s*x multiple times so that they get tired of it...and learn to concentrate on other things..and dont have obsession for it any more....what an odd idea of inculcating this "morality" in people!

 

he has many followers in india...i m sure some of u will be knowing by now whom i m referring to..

 

so it's better to be one's own guru than to follow these modern day so called gurus...when one proceeds on spirituality properly,he will get answers to all his problems himself..he wont need a guru


(Guest)

Trouble comes when we don’t know what we have to do and find help,ask for experienced persons.

One cannot be happy, get answer if he does not know what he has to do. A guru  is one who is regarded as having great knowledge, wisdom and authority in a certain area, and who uses it to guide others (teacher)

We  come to this forum( This site is also our guru) because of why ? Getting knowledge and sharing thought to the people.

If one can be one's guru he did not ask to anyone .

After gettind great knowledge one can be one's guru he will get answers to all his problems himself..he wont need a guru.

Don’t see negative side, see positive thought. You get knowledge from your enemy (I repeate positive side), from good person and bad person also.


(Guest)

aishwarya divorced status is a stigma to men as well as women.

as per ur post

"Many men/women want to divorce the current spouse and then have a 2nd marriage.

It's understandable if divorce is due to reasons like aduletry and cruelty."

1.what is adultery as per u (not legal definition), i mean how much space u wud give to ur spouse

2.and define what constitutes cruelty to spouse according to you for which a spouse should go for divorce


(Guest)

AISHWAYA i am still waiting for your response


(Guest)

Dabangg Lady,

You said that AISHWAYA i am still waiting for your response

AISHWAYA has deleted her profile.

So,this query  ends here.

1 Like

dream (individual)     28 September 2010

First of a suggestion @Aishwarya and other like minded feminazis,

You should have given the examples of the women instead of men to have made it juicier. I further suggest that in the guise of this topic, donot promote male-hatred or misandry by giving "males are the ones who do this, etc."  You are encouraged and empowered to quote examples of women. After all, you want women empowerment and upliftment, dont you?

 

Next, I pity all those men who jumped into this discussion when, after reading the male example, started justifying.


A visit to any of the family courts in the country and a simple skim thru the cause-list, it does not require any qualifications to know that it is the petitioner-wife vs petitioner-husband ratio would 70:30.

Even of Aishwarya has deleted her profile, there are other such women who are capable of replying to Dabangg Lady's queries.


(Guest)

no they are there to look for opputunity cost. even supreme court has asked govt to bring changes in law to bring end to misuse of the gender biased laws.

dream (individual)     28 September 2010

@Prabhakar,

All the examples are NOT AT ALL relevant in this topic. Those were not between members of an entities called family. All those cases in labour courts, under rent control provisions, etc. are filed after a breach of agreement between two "external entitites" or whatever.

Again I differ with you when you are trying to bias the readers with subtle comments that woman is weak and coz man is powerful, he is to pay up. This is nothing but attrocious promotion of gender-hatred and bias. Not sure which provision or code of conduct of the lawyers are you violating.

No Mr.Prabhakar, i am sure you are trying to coy down the tone and severity of the Apex court's ruling in Aug, 2010 directing the govt. review the provision of gender biased laws to curb the misuse.  More than anything else, i do understand your interest-at-stake.


(Guest)

please delete AISHWARYA'S fake id


(Guest)

JAI SHRI RAM


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading