Pratikesh Balasaheb Nagare 19 May 2020
Jarwani Bhavika 19 May 2020
P. Venu (Advocate) 19 May 2020
How is the hyperthyroidism affecting the marriage? Please post the material facts.
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 20 May 2020
Concealment of efficeny (hyper thyroid) by either of the spouse do not attract the provision of Section 12(1)(c) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 which is reproduced here under:
12. Voidable marriages. (1) Any marriage solemnised, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be voidable and may be annulled by a decree of nullity on any of the following grounds, namely: 1[(a) that the marriage has not been consummated owing to the imporence of the respondent; or] (b) that the marriage is in contravention of the condition specified in clause (ii) of section 5; or (c) that the consent of the petitioner, or where the consent of the guardian in marriage of the petitioner 2[was required under section 5 as it stood immediately before the commencement of the Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1978 (2 of 1978)], the consent of such guardian was obtained by force 3[or by fraud as to the nature of the ceremony or as to any material fact or circumstances concerning the respondent]; or (d) that the respondent was at the time of the marriage pregnant by some person other than the petitioner. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no petition for annulling a marriage (a) on the ground specified in clause (c) of sub-section (1) shall be entertained if (i) the petition is presented more than one year after the force had ceased to operate or, as the case may be, the fraud had been discovered; or (ii) the petitioner has, with his or her full consent, lived with the other party to the marriage as husband or wife after the force had ceased to operate or, as the case may be, the fraud had been discovered; (b) on the ground specified in clause (d) of sub-section (1) shall be entertained unless the court is satisfied (i) that the petitioner was at the time of the marriage ignorant of the facts alleged; (ii) that proceedings have been instituted in the case of a marriage solemnised before the commencement of this Act within one year of such commencement and in the case of marriages solemnised after such commencement within one year from the date of the marriage; and (iii) that marital intercourse with the consent of the petitioner has not taken place since the discovery by the petitioner of the existence of 4[the said ground]. |
Pratikesh Balasaheb Nagare 20 May 2020
P. Venu (Advocate) 20 May 2020
I understand Except the last two lines "all this creats disturbance in marriage... change in behaviour,attempt to sucicide,self injury creats cruelty over husband"
But how this could be ground for seeking annulment of the marriage under Section 12(1)(c)?
Pratikesh Balasaheb Nagare 20 May 2020
P. Venu (Advocate) 20 May 2020
Pratikesh Balasaheb Nagare 20 May 2020