How to fight suit for injuction in family court

Your post is very interesting.  May I know to  which religion you belong? 

"Hindu"  -- Forgot to mention it ..

I have got a good belly laugh after a long time.  You also file an application against that 'chor party' that an injunction shall be passed against her to remarry (do not mention during the pendency of proceedings) in the interest of equity and get a good laugh yourself during the proceedings.

Your query is very vague and incomplete.  In the absence of details or contradicting information, no proper opinion can be rendered. One side you are referring to the pending DV case and 498A case, he other side you are talking about a pending civil case for which you have quoted some irrelevant provision of law.  Further more instead seeking advise to tackle your problem and suggestions to come out of the crisis, you are asking somebody to share his experience.  Others problems may be identical but the solution cannot be expected to compatible, in fact they will be misguiding to your issue. therefore first you clarify yourself and then come out the a query after understanding fully about what you want to ask here.

@Chandrashekar Sir,  Thank you very much for you response, I'm not able to Find what is Rule 7 of CPC 142, or CPC 142 itself. Further to your response may I ask you this >> Should I contest this case or not <<

@T. Kalaiselven Sir, really sorry that I have not framed question in easily understandable way

My question Miss 498a (my so called Wife) has filed in suit for injunction in family asking court to issue order to me saying I should not marry second wife (My say is why should I get marry when I'm fighting my DV & #498a ) Hence, question aroused to me is Should I fight this case or just leave it.

Sincerely Thanking you for your time and guidance

For me, it appears that it is a suit under Section 7 of the Family Court Act.  In family court Act, such kind of suit is permssible in the religion of the respondent allows bigamy / polygamy, but not for Hindus, for the reason that the second marriage while subsistence of first marriage is void ab initio.  Hence, such suit will be dismissed as maintainable.  But if you want to get kick of it and you are in a financially sound position, then go and contest the case for suit's dismissal or alternatively imposing the same restraint on the plaintiff (wife), i.e.,   she should not marry again, also in the interest of equity.  I also reproduce Section 7 of the Family Court Act for your easy understanding:

7. Jurisdiction.—(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall—

Explanation.—The suits and proceedings referred to in this sub-section are suits and proceedings of the following nature, namely:—

(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall also have and exercise—

@Chandrashekar Sir, absolutely Sir I think you are almost on dot. today I got to know that chor party have filed an Application under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 r/w 151 CPC .
Sir you have made will point also, " For me, it appears that it is a suit under Section 7 of the Family Court Act.  In family court Act, such kind of suit is permissible in the religion of the respondent allows bigamy / polygamy, but not for Hindus, for the reason that the second marriage while subsistence of first marriage is void ab initio. "

Respected Sirs, I don' t know what is the case stage now, since last week only I have started getting notices, but date mentioned is of October 2014 .. anyways now with this guidance I shall try contesting this one too.. Pls bless me.

Steps I follow now
- First will get clear information case stage / status
- will find a suitable lawyer
- once the picture is clear, I will start with objections

Once again Thank you very much all