Urgent:- How to counter impotence qua wife only allegation?
NeedHelp (I) 07 November 2016
Urgent:- How to counter impotence qua wife only allegation?
Ms.Usha Kapoor (CEO) 08 November 2016
Get tested vby two eminent s*xologists fo potency tests.If THEY find you THATyour erection is normal AND YOU CAN HOLD IT FOR FEW MINUTES HE WILL DECLARE YOU AS POTENT. ONCE YOU PROVE YOUR POTENCY HER FALSE ALLEGATION FALLFLAT ONHRFACE. SO DSURING COURT HEARING YOU CAN PRODUCE THESE EXPERT EVIDENCE ANS PROVE YOU POTENCY.EVEN IF YOU FAIL IN POTENCY IMPLANTS ARE THERE WHICH WOULD HELP YOU IN MAINTAINING ERECTION FOR FEW MINUTES. SO DON'T WORRY. MARCH AHEAD WIH GREATER GUSTO!iF YOU APPRECIATE THIS ANSWER PLEASE CONVEY MY FORUM THNAKS.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 08 November 2016
A qualified Andrologist/Urologist can certifiy that you are not impotent and do not have ED etc .....
Kumar Doab (FIN) 08 November 2016
And also ED can be cured medically/with surgical intervention.
dr g balakrishnan (advocate/counsel supreme court) 08 November 2016
Problem is failing to give s*xual satisfaction as ejacukation just takes place or not.
see my note;
Why no authenticity?
In adolesence, there is no clarity of what one would do in his life, as every one thinks some meaningless ‘ideas’ mostly ‘unworkable’ perceptions based; as parents or peers guide your course of life, but till you stand ‘firm’ of what could you do, that is obviously, depending on your skill levels only; and your own ‘skills’ only can cause a course of life, but yet again depends on ‘emotional intelligence and social intelligence ‘ you develop in you, for every one is just a ‘unique person’ only; your parentage cannot develop your skills or emotional inteligence or social intelligence.
Emotional intelligence only is like ‘water’, as ‘water alone can find its own level in every surrounding conditions; for it flows well in all kinds of every difficult environs; that is how you have to organize yourself; but most of us fail, just because you cannot cut yourself to suit with your married partner, for you get upset just at the drop of the hat, then you say ‘I will divorce you, as if that wife is just like some ‘thing’ only, and he fails to realize she is as good as you , a human being with frailties and failings you are in, in your life surrounds or environs.
Therefore, when you cannot adjust with one spouse who has come into your life from different environment and surroundings, obviously , you just screwed up your ‘emotional intelligence’; when so , you might noteven fit in with your work environment, that shifts you on and on from one kind of job to the other, till you fit in; as you were like some ‘square peg in a round hole’; as you were in the education and study environment, that changed your courses of or in education cycles.
You may find always fault with your bosses, or managers, or employers, for they really hired you to fit yourself like a ‘square in a square hole’ and is called compatibility with work; but most today fail, just because today you think you can decide on jobs as you think about your ‘spouse’; if one spouse fails, you think another new spouse might fit in with you, a serious ‘misconception ‘ you suffer’ as you did with your jobs; that way your ‘emotional intelligence’ obviously very weak is obviously absolutely as for as your ‘Emotional Intelligence’ levels concerned.
Hence, youpick up unintelligent meaningless ‘quarrels’ in every kind of new ‘environs’ ; while females tried to adjust but they too lost track today that leads to unintelligent separations from husband unlike in the past, then the females obviously behaved like ‘slaves’ ; but today , they need as much independence and freedom as you like to choose for; how then compatibility is possible, unless there is very tough shock treatment is present.
This ‘shock treatment ‘ both spouses deserve today; courts are yet to appreciate psychology of marriages, like ‘law makers who simply made some meaningless statutes of and on, that adds fuel to the ‘fire’ of LIFE.
Life obviously is like a ‘sea surfing’ mechanism; if you fail you go off track and meet with obvious ‘ life accidents’, as you get in road accidents of very serious nature.
With the above perception, let us wade through further in our chosen topic why ‘No Authentic…’; and try to meet with our objective.
dr g balakrishnan (advocate/counsel supreme court) 08 November 2016
Better organize your 'emotional intelligence' better just to ensure you are not a square peg in a round hole'
Kumar Doab (FIN) 09 November 2016
Allegations are allegations.
The sour the relationship.
If separation is unavoidable and baseless allegations have been levelled, then you can also request medical examination of wife to establish if she has been habitual of coitus in married life.
sai narayana 14 November 2016
Impotence qua petitioner is difficult to defend. To defend it you must have kids or video of your performance with her.
innocenthusband 14 November 2016
Sad this forum is filled with jokers who mention that you need to have "video of your performance with her", what kind of "advice" are these stupid morons dispensing here?
The way to prove is by volunteering to have the potency test conducted on you from a govt. hospital. No judge can deny that and you can prove yourself capable with a govt. hospital issued certificate which will prove that you are of sound physical and mental health.
sai narayana 14 November 2016
I used the words "vidoe of performance" is to stress the severity of the issue that it's difficult to defend such allegation unless you have a concrete proof or version to withstand it, and not to read those words with true meaning.
Some fools don't know the difference between Impotence qua wife and impotence in general so thinks others as morons and jokers with their foolish suggestions and provocative comments.
And one more point, whenever anyone face impotency allegation, never ever volunteer for tests until the judge asks to do so or at least the petitioner files his/herchief affidavit. Any premature or over excitation will leads you into more trouble, because the court may presume adversely against you that you deliberately avoided s*x with partner, so either you had done mental cruelty or impotent-qua-petitioner.
innocenthusband 15 November 2016
Originally posted by : sai narayana | ||
I used the words "vidoe of performance" is to stress the severity of the issue that it's difficult to defend such allegation unless you have a concrete proof or version to withstand it, and not to read those words with true meaning. |
Nobody has "won" any case by submitting any "video of performance". You don't need to "stress the severity of the issue" in your pointless drivel. Lots of women have used such allegations and the only way forward is to prove that you are not impotent. There is no other way than submitting oneself for a medical test to confirm the same.
Originally posted by : sai narayana | ||
Some fools don't know the difference between Impotence qua wife and impotence in general so thinks others as morons and jokers with their foolish suggestions and provocative comments. |
There is only one form of impotence which is recognized by the court, and the medical term for it is just "impotence". Don't attach tags to it such as "impotence qua wife", "general impotence" or "despondent impotence", "too tired to have s*x impotence". Shut your stupid drivel. If you don' t understand what medical impotence is, use google. Its free, and it helps you understand it rather than making a fool of yourself in public.
Originally posted by : sai narayana | ||
And one more point, whenever anyone face impotency allegation, never ever volunteer for tests until the judge asks to do so or at least the petitioner files his/herchief affidavit. Any premature or over excitation will leads you into more trouble, because the court may presume adversely against you that you deliberately avoided s*x with partner, so either you had done mental cruelty or impotent-qua-petitioner. |
Either the petitioner asks for the respondent to conduct the test, if they don't, respondent submit for the test to be conducted, The court has no right to presume anything unless a medical test proves otherwise. The court cannot decide or presume anything about the status of an organ inside your pants. Since the matter is medical in nature, i.e using the term "impotence", it has to be proven to the court that the respondent either suffers from impotence or does not. There is no foolproof test other than a medical test.
You cannot strip down or submit photos of your organ. Any other means of proving potency cannot be accepted legally. The medical test certificate is the standard means of disproving allegations. Once again, use google to find out how people have submitted to the test and demolished such frivolous cases.
You have no idea about what you are talking of. The best thing an idiotic fool can do is to shut their mouth rather than open it and remove all doubt.
sai narayana 15 November 2016
Instead of responding to rogue comments, I confine myself to responding to OP's post.
I am reiterating what I said earlier, Impotence in general and Impotence qua is completely different and so don't volunteer yourself for tests and instead concentrate on the petitioner's corroboration to counter it meticulously. You need a able counsel to cross examine the petitioner.
Wish you good luck.