Using crpc 91 in hc during perjury revision.

At the time of filing Crpc 125, if she is employed and still she claims that she has no income, then that act falls under perjury.

Probably to avoid perjury case against her, she might have resigned and changing jobs continously. 

Please get tax returns from Income tax department thru CRPC 91 from Court, if she her income is above 1.5 Lakhs which is an authenticate document.

Thanks

KNK

Dear KNK,

I have submitted PF details, as she never filed IT Returns as the salary was below prescribed limit. Family Court in its Judgment of CrPC 125 have admitted and stated as below....

"Though it is the evidence of non applicant that during her stay at his house applicant No 1 was doing job. He has produced one document regarding provident fund of Applicant no.1 at Exh.46 to show that applicant was doing job. No doubt, it appears from Exh.46 that Applicant No 1 was working with Hindustan Security and Fire Services but merely because of this it cannot b presumed that at present also she is working. Non applicant also relied on Exh.55, it is status of applicant on Times job search India's best job on line. It reflects from his document that on 7th June 2012 it has been updated and in this current employer of applicant has shown as Millennium Realities. However, this document is not authentic one to hold that present applicant is earning."

And there are other issues also which attract Perjury.

summon Millennuim Realities about the employee details and present status

Thanks