LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

498a witness

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 03 November 2011 This query is : Resolved 
Witness, Inlaws allegations --> demand of additional dowry after since the day of marriage & allegated this was going until 14 years.

How should they prove , when inlaws are not staying with her daughter, Just mere allegation is sufficient ?

Or will this be false witness or not unblemished witness, experts please reply.
M.Sheik Mohammed Ali (Expert) 03 November 2011
mere allegation not value for complaint,
ajay sethi (Expert) 03 November 2011
you have to deny the allegations . bruden of proof is on complainant .
prabhakar singh (Expert) 03 November 2011
i agree with depth M.Sheik Mohammed Ali possesses but clarity is found only in Mr.Sethi.
Shonee Kapoor (Expert) 03 November 2011
Dear Author,

You would get to cross-examine the witnesses and punch holes in their testimony.

If conviction was to be based on allegations and witness, without accused provided the opportunity, then there was no need for courts and trial.

Regards,

Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :