Abuse of slp

Guest (Querist) 03 September 2016 This query is : Resolved
In consumer protection act there is no appeal form NCDRC order. But a window has been provided to file SLP in 90 days time to supreme court
But SLP is confined to matters of substantial constituional or human rights casue oer of punbli9c interst

Can a party file SLP as a matter of routine to continue litigaiton specially the servcie provider company? and not the consuemr

If the case does not fall in any of sections 4 to 24 of Limitationb act can superme court allow delay of 3 months over 3 months alreayd allowed in a simple consuemr case over riidng section 3 of limitation act?

Is SLP not abuse of law to perpetuate litigation by rich and powerful

Should SLP be allowed in special legslations like Consumer case where no matter of life and death, consituoion or public interst is involved . In fact public interst goes againstservcie providers.

Can any petitiner take plea that inter boffcial correspondnece caused the delay by vetting of issue by several offceirs at HO and branch.?

Can big orgainsaitons like Post offcie take please of delay without any disbaling conditions in enviornment like floods, war or such calamities?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Ms.Usha Kapoor (Expert) 06 September 2016
Dear Client

Certainly a lot of Public interest is involved and eversince the consumer forums have arrived be they are products OR SERVICES THEY ARE DELIVERING VERDICTS TO THE BENEFIT OF COMMON MAN. Many MANUFACTURERS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS HAD TO IMPROVE THEIR QUALITY OF SERVICE AND EITHER REPLACE A NEW PRODUCT IN PLACE OF DEFECTIVE PRODUCT OR IN MATTERS OF DEFICIENCY OF SERVICE SERVICE PROVIDERS ARE PAYING HEFTY COMPENSATION TO THE PURCHASERS OF THE SERVICE THEREBY MAKING THE MANUFACTURERS OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS TO IMPROVE THEIR QUALITY OF PRODUCTS AND RENDER BETTER QUALITY SERVICES OR PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT. HENCE AN APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT FROM THE National CONSUMER FORUM IN public INTEREST IS NOT ABUSE OF SLP. Ultimately IT'D BENEFIT LOTS OF POOR AND middle CLASS PEOPLE. Compared TO ORDINARY COURTS CONSUMER COURTS CASE DISPOSAL TIME ALSO IS VERY QUICK. Supreme court decisions ARE LAW OF THE LAND AND BINDING ON ALL CITIZENS OF India UNTIL Parliament LEGISLATES ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.

Guest (Querist) 07 September 2016
Thank you.Are yuou taling of SLP or PIL? they are different. SLP is a gate to open civil channle of litgation after there is no appeal left .
Curts should discourage SLP unless these are of national import, human rights violation and interpretiation of cosntitution

Ms.Usha Kapoor (Expert) 08 September 2016
Multinational corporations are violating our human rights such as coco cola and Maggie releasing polluted products such as containing pesticides beyond the permissible limit and Maggie food contaminated with e coli bacteria making us eat poisonous food and they are pushing spurious medical drugs which are lethal are they not violating our human rights to life and Health?. They are walking away with profits while making us suffer from dreaded diseases to which ultimately we may succumb.Multinational COMPANIES AR PUSHING SALES OF LETHAL DRUGS OF MEDICINE, FOOD ITEMS ETC ARE WALKING AWAY OR LAUGHING THEIR WAY TO BANK WITH PROFITS WHILE WE Indians ARE MADE TO SUFFER from OUR HEALTH AND AS RESULT OF WHICH WE MAY DIE IN THE END. I STRONGLY ADVOCATE RETENTION OF SLP AGAINST THE VERDICT OF National CONSUMER FORUM WHETHER IT IS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF public INTEREST OR FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF HUMAN rights. THE supreme COURT VERDICT WHICH HAS A FINAL SAY ON ANYTHING IS THE NEED OF THE HOUR. Hence RETENTION OF SLP IS JUSTIFIED BOTH From Legal point OF VIEW AND FROM Justice POINT OF VIEW.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries